|
|
|
| Clinical Efficacy Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with Posterior Cervical Single Door and Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation |
| ZENG Hui, YAO Chuliang, YANG Yanxin, et al |
| Armed Police Corps General Hospital of Guangdong, Guangdong Guangzhou 510507, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the clinical effect of single open-door Expansive Laminoplasty combined with pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of traumatic long cervical spinal cord injury. Methods: From June 2012 to June 2017, 86 patients with traumatic long cervical spinal cord injury were selected and divided into observation group (n = 42) and control group (n = 44).The patients in the observation group were treated with single open-door Expansive Laminoplasty combined with pedicle screw fixation, while the patients in the control group were treated with nail shock therapy. The patients in the two groups were followed up for 12~36 months after the treatment. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. To compare the clinical efficacy the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA) and the incidence of complications of the two groups. Results: The excellent and good rate of clinical effect in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in JOA scores between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). The JOA scores of the two groups were significantly improved after 12 months of follow-up , and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The JOA score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group after 12 months follow-up (P<0.05). The incidence of total complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of traumatic long cervical spinal cord injury with single open-door expansive laminoplasty combined with pedicle screw fixation has a good clinical effect. It can effectively improve the cervical spinal cord function, reduce the incidence of complications and improve the quality of life of the patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 白新海,白睿.MRI在无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤诊疗中的应用[J].河北医学,2017,23(5):830~832.
[2] 陈启明,陈其昕.非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤预后的多因素分析[J].中国骨伤,2016,29(3):242~247.
[3] 李景欣,李立新,何发胜,等.无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤的治疗选择与疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2014,29(11):1135~1136.
[4] 张广泉,刘珂,高延征,等.成人多节段无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤不同治疗方法的疗效对比分析[J].中华神经医学杂志,2013,12(9):940~943.
[5] 戴斌,张兵,王金荣,等.颈椎前路减压融合内固定治疗成人无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤的疗效分析[J].现代医学,2017(2):210~214.
[6] 庄彦,曹晓建.椎弓根外侧壁破坏对脊柱椎弓根钉内固定生物力学强度的影响[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2015,29(02):189~193. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 25 
