|
|
Effect of Three Fixation Methods of Sengstaken-Blakemore Tube on Compression Hemostasis in Patients with Esophageal and Gastric Varices Bleeding |
GUO Lei, ZHAO Lifang, LU Wei |
The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an 710032, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the application efficacy of three fixation methods of Sengstaken-Blakemore tube on compression hemostasis in patients with esophageal and gastric varices bleeding. Methods: A total of 210 patients with esophageal and gastric varices bleeding admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to October 2022 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into traditional fixation group, rhinobyon fixation group and table tennis fixation group by means of the randomization method, with 70 cases in each group. The traditional fixation group was fixed with Sengstaken-Blakemore tube by traditional method, and the rhinobyon fixation group was fixed by rhinobyon method, and the table tennis fixation group was fixed by table tennis method. The clinical efficacy (hemostasis effective rate, bleeding control time, blood transfusion volume, rebleeding rate), incidence rates of complications (nasal mucosa damage, asphyxia, chest tightness, retrosternal pain, throat injury), airbag breakage rate and catheterization success rate were compared among the three groups of patients. The differences in bleeding-related biochemical indicators (hemoglobin, urea nitrogen, platelet count) and coagulation function indicators (fibrinogen content, prothrombin time, thromboplastin time) were recorded before treatment and at 6 months after treatment. Results: The hemostasis effective rate and success rate of catheterization were shown as table tennis fixation group (97.44%, 100%) >rhinobyon fixation group (94.87%, 97.14%) >traditional fixation group (87.50%, 78.57%) (P<0.05). The clinical efficacy indexes (bleeding control time, blood transfusion volume) were manifested as table tennis fixation group<thromboplastin fixation group<traditional fixation group (P<0.05). Compared with before treatment, the hemoglobin content and platelet count in the three groups were significantly increased at 6 months after treatment (P<0.05), and the increases revealed table tennis fixation group>thromboplastin fixation group>traditional fixation group. The concentration of urea nitrogen was significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the decrease was expressed as table tennis fixation group>thromboplastin fixation group>traditional fixation group. There were no obvious differences in rebleeding rate, airbag breakage rate and coagulation function indicators among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with rhinobyon fixation method and traditional fixation method, table tennis fixation method with Sengstaken-Blakemore tube can more effectively improve the clinical hemostatic efficacy and reduce the probability of complications to the greatest extent, and it has a higher success rate.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 逯世林,张娜,王琳,等.抗凝血酶Ⅲ在乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期和并发食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血中的评估价值[J].中华消化杂志,2022,42(11):770-746. [2] 张云,朱荣兰,吴兆华,等.改良三腔二囊管压迫联合生长抑素及泮托拉唑治疗食管胃底静脉曲张出血的临床观察[J].肝脏,2021,26(4):403-406. [3] 周胜云,李增魁,段志辉,等.三腔二囊管在辅助急性内镜下组织胶注射术联合硬化剂注射,静脉曲张套扎治疗食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的作用观察[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2020,(1):128-129. [4] 丹珠永吉,刘芝兰,禄艳艳,等.内镜下序贯套扎和硬化剂治疗肝硬化并发食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者疗效及对血流动力学的影响对比研究[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2019,22(5):692-695. [5] 中国医学会外科分会,门静脉高压症血组.肝硬化门静脉高压症食管、胃底静脉曲张破裂出血诊治专家共识(2015)[J].中华外科杂志,2015,35(10):1086-1090 [6] 刘立楠,常宇飞,薛成莲.急诊肝硬化所致食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血预后分析[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2021,26(5):620-624. [7] 顾雪珍,夏玉敬,王梦恬,等.内镜干预联合普萘洛尔治疗食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的临床研究[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2022,43(5):651-657. [8] 黄璐,刘琦,陈汶,等.内镜下治疗急性食管-胃底静脉曲张破裂出血过程中应用透明鞘注射针的效果观察[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2021,28(4):461-464 [9] 马佳丽,何玲玲,蒋煜,等.内镜治疗食管胃底静脉曲张并发脾梗死及反复腹腔感染1例报告[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2022,38(9):2113-2115. [10] 陈彩霞,胡藻.内镜下硬化剂联合组织胶治疗食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血后早期再出血的危险因素研究[J].国际消化病杂志,2018,38(6):397-401. [11] 刘华柱,张献文,张欢,等.D-二聚体/血小板、纤维蛋白原/白蛋白预测乙肝肝硬化患者食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的临床价值[J].转化医学杂志,2022,11(3):137-141. [12] 刘香,路伟,郭蕾,等.改良三腔二囊管压迫止血联合内镜介入治疗食管-胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者临床疗效和安全性分析[J].解放军医药杂志,2020,32(11):59-62. |
[1] |
. [J]. HeBei Med, 2017, 23(11): 1836-1838. |
|
|
|
|