浓缩生长因子联合Biooss骨替代材料应用于即刻种植下颌后牙区骨缺失治疗的价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2023.08.017

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (1228 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To study the application value of concentrated growth factor (CGF) and Biooss bone substitute materials in mandibular implants. Methods: A total of 101 patients with immediate implant bone loss in mandibular posterior area in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected, and the patients were grouped according to differences in treatment regimen: 51 in observation group and 50 in control group, The control group was treated with the Biooss bone substitute material, the observation group was given concentrated growth factors on the basis of the control group.The patients were followed up by telephone and outpatient clinic 6 months after the treatment to compare the horizontal and vertical bone grafting, bone thickness and bone regeneration effects between the two groups; the clinical efficacy of the patients was evaluated according to the changes in the postoperative stability coefficients (ISQ), and the levels of bone thickness, bone density, and bone width were compared between the two groups at the immediate postoperative stage, at 3 months after the surgery and at 6 months after the surgery; and the patients were compared with respect to the degree of recovery of the postoperative masticatory function, the height of gingival papilla attachment and overall dental esthetic degree index measurements. The measured values of the patients' postoperative masticatory function recovery, gingival papilla attachment height, and overall dental esthetics were compared. At the end of the follow-up period, patients' satisfaction with the treatment was collected and the differences between groups were compared. Results: The effect of bone regeneration in the horizontal and vertical directions (94.00%,92.00%) was better than that of the control group (90.19%,86.27%). The ISQ mean of patients in control group decreased first and then increased, with the lowest ISQ score of the patients, and the ISQ mean of observation group showed an increasing trend. The ISQ mean was different between both groups at 1 week and 4 weeks after the operation, and the mean of observation group was higher than that of control group (P<0.05), but the difference between the immediate postoperative and 8 weeks was not significant (P>0.05). The immediate bone thickness, bone width and bone density values in the two groups were comparable (P>0.05); compared 3 and 6 months after surgery, and observation group was higher than serums (P<0.05). Compared with serums, the recovery degree of masticatory function, the height of the whole gingival nipple increased, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The treatment satisfaction of observers was (96.00%)was higher than that of serums (84.31%), (P<0.05). Conclusion: Concentrate growth factor (CGF) and Biooss bone replacement material can improve patient satisfaction and bone regeneration effect, maintain the stability of postoperative implant, and have good clinical application effect.

Key words： Concentrated growth factor Biooss Immediate implant Bone loss Bone regeneration

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Hongbo
	SUN Chuanfeng
	ZHANG Yang

Cite this article:

ZHANG Hongbo,SUN Chuanfeng,ZHANG Yang. Value of Concentrated Growth Factors Combined with Biooss Bone Substitute Materials for the Treatment of Bone Loss in Mandibular Posterior Region with Immediate Implantation[J]. HeBei Med, 2023, 29(8): 1318-1324.

URL:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2023.08.017 OR http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/Y2023/V29/I8/1318

[1] Canellas J,Soares B N,Ritto F G,et al.What grafting materials produce greater alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction:a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J].Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery,2021,49(11):1064-1071.
[2] 毛新霞,林晓炜,魏轩,等.自体牙本质颗粒与Bio-Oss骨粉植入引导骨再生治疗牙周骨缺损效果比较[J].上海口腔医学,2022,31(5):530-534.
[3] Shen X,Yang S,Xu Y,et al.Analysis of implant loss risk factors after simultaneous guided bone regeneration:a retrospective study of 5404 dental implants[J].Clinical implant dentistry and related research,2022,24(3):276-286.
[4] Chatelet M,Afota F,Savoldelli C.Review of bone graft and implant survival rate:a comparison between autogenous bone block versus guided bone regeneration[J].Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2022,123(2):222-227.
[5] Chang C C,Kim S K,Lee C T.A novel approach to assess volumetric bone loss at immediate implant sites and comparison to linear measurements:a pilot study[J].Journal of Dentistry,2022,120(8):104083.
[6] Aldhohrah T,Qin G,Liang D,et al.Does simultaneous soft tissue augmentation around immediate or delayed dental implant placement using sub-epithelial connective tissue graft provide better outcomes compared to other treatment options:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].PLoS ONE,2022,17(2):261513.
[7] 肖莎,高承志,周冬平.三种骨替代材料修复即刻种植下颌后牙区周围骨缺损的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(34):5495-5500.
[8] 程福新,杨红.后牙缺失区骨水平种植体早期边缘骨吸收相关因素分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2021,37(10):619-621.
[9] Medina-Galvez R,O Canto-Naves,Marimon X,et al.Bone stress evaluation with and without cortical bone using several dental restorative materials subjected to impact load:a fully 3D transient finite-element study[J].Materials,2021,14(19):5801-5804.
[10] J Gonzalez-Serrano,Vallina C,C Gonzalez-Serrano,et al.Effect of platelet concentrates on marginal bone loss of immediate implant procedures:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Materials,2021,14(16):4582-4584.
[11] 陈传鸿,高丽荣,张建全.富自体浓缩生长因子结合Bio-Oss骨粉在颌骨囊肿术后骨缺损区的修复效果[J].江苏医药,2022,48(9):926-930.
[12] 付欣,郑冬冬,魏娜.浓缩生长因子对上颌后牙区种植骨增量术后反应及创口愈合的影响[J].北京医学,2022,44(6):558-560.
[13] 周兵,余丽娜,范莹莹.Bio-Oss骨粉联合或单独使用浓缩生长因子与胶原蛋白在下颌阻生智齿导致第二磨牙远中骨缺损的修复效果比较[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2022,43(6):983-987.