|
|
|
| Clinical Value of Vacuum Sealing Drainage in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer with Different Severity |
| WU Miaoqiong, LIU Yanhong, LUO Qunfang, et al |
| The Central Hospital of Kaiping, Guangdong Kaiping 529300, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the clinical value of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in different severity of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) by randomized controlled study. Methods: 40 cases of patients selected Wagner 2~4 grade of DFU were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, each of 20 cases. The treatment group was treated with VSD after debridement; the control group created by the method of wet dressing; 4 weeks of observation, to compare the two methods of different severity of DFU clinical effect. Results: The number of days in hospital, the number of dressing changes and the number of times of dressing change and cure time were significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The total effective rate of the observation group was 100.0%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group of 80.0%, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: DFU using (VSD) basically to avoid major amputation and achieve guaranteed toe salvage and to retain the ability of action; VSD surgery treatment at all different severity of DFU effect is significant, hospitalization time and frequency of changing dressings reduce, and the total cost of health care has no advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张春兰,张笑燕.负压封闭引流技术在糖尿病足溃疡中的应用现状[J].护理实践与研究,2014,11(2):19~20.
[2] 牛文芳,许樟荣.封闭式负压引流促进糖尿病足溃疡愈合的研究进展[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2012,20(3):229~231.
[3] 李玲,臧莎莎,荣光耀.糖尿病足溃疡的危险因素与治疗进展[J].中国全科医学,2013,16(9C):3159~3163.
[4] 高岚,周文君,高小华,等.封闭负压引流(VSD)技术治疗糖尿病足创面的疗效研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2011,32(13):2199~2200.
[5] 王玉珍,许樟荣.住院糖尿病足病临床诊治指南[J].药品评价,2013,10(17):43~45.
[6] 林楚佳,林少达,黄少薇,等.糖尿病足患者下肢血管病变分析[J].中国临床研究,2011,24(4):274~276. |
| [1] |
. [J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(2): 317-319. |
|
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 23 
