|
|
Curative Effect of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Large-Volume Prostate and Its Influence on Urodynamics Serum T-PSA and F-PSA Levels |
HUANG Wei, HAN Junling, SHEN Hongfeng |
The 928 Hospital of Joint Service Logistic Support Forces of the People's Liberation Army, Hainan Haikou 570206, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To study the curative effect of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) in the treatment of large-volume prostate, and its influence on urodynamics, serum total prostate specific antigen (T-PSA) and free prostate specific antigen (F-PSA) levels. Methods: A total of 107 male patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) treated in the hospital between January 2018 and December 2020 were enrolled in and randomly divided into control group (53 cases) and observation group (54 cases). The control group was treated with transurethral resection prostate (TURP), while observation group was treated with HOLEP. The surgical indexes, serum T-PSA and F-PSA levels, urodynamics, sexual function and the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups were compared. Results: Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly longer operation time, bladder irrigation time, catheter indwelling time and hospital stay, and significantly less blood loss (P<0.05). At 3 months after surgery, the observation group had significantly larger urine flow and bladder volume, and significantly less residual urine than the control group (P<0.05). At 1 month after surgery, the observation group had significantly lower serum T-PSA and F-PSA levels than the control group (P<0.05). At 3 months after surgery, the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) scores and Chinese Index of Sexual Function for Premature Ejaculation (CIPE) scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05), and incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: HOLEP is safer in treating patients with large-volume prostate. It can improve urodynamics, reduce levels of T-PSA and F-PSA, and reduce postoperative complications.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 王子锋,张宏,杨群,等.钬激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道等离子前列腺剜除电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的效果对比[J].中国综合临床,2015,31(9):831~834. [2] 杨精华,丁平,饶建明,等.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术与电切术治疗前列腺增生的比较研究[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2015,12(6):117~119. [3] Liu Z,Li YW,Wu WR,et al.Long-term clinical efficacy and safety profile of transurethral resection of prostate versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Urology,2017,8(103):198~203. [4] 张豪杰,盛璐,陈然,等.经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生的疗效比较[J].中国临床医学,2016,23(5):636~639. [5] Piao S,Choo MS,Kim M,et al.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is safe for patients above 80 years:a prospective study[J].Int Neurourol,2016,20(2):143~150. [6] 陈孝平,汪建平.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.278~280. [7] 张作记.行为医学量表手册[M].中华医学电子音像出版社,200.278~279. [8] Tammela T,Nurmi M,Petas A,et al.Update on current care guidelines:benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Duodecim.2012,128(10):1046~1047. [9] Martin S,Lange K,Haren MT,et al.Members of the florey adelaide male ageing study.Risk factors for progression or improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms in a prospective cohort of men[J].Urol,2014,191(1):130~137. [10] 王建文,张孟冬,平浩,等.前列腺等离子剜切术和钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效分析[J].中华男科学杂志,2018,24(12):1084~1088. [11] 罗怀景,张婷婷,董兴模,等.前列腺钬激光剜除术与等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生临床对比研究[J].福建医药杂志,2020,42(4):40~43. [12] 朱瑞,刘航,李茂,等.HoLEP治疗良性前列腺增生合并急性尿潴留的临床疗效及安全性研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2019,44(8):1074~1080. |
|
|
|