V形切口与"S"形切口对腮腺良性肿瘤患者的美容效果研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2021.10.025

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (13)
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (1242 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To explore the cosmetic outcomes of V incision versus S incision in patients with benign tumors of the parotid gland. Methods: A total of 189 patients with benign tumors of the parotid gland treated in our hospital from September 2018 to March 2021 were selected and divided into three groups according to the random number method: Group s (94 patients) and group V (95 patients). Group s had S incision surgery, group V had V incision surgery. Surgery related indicators [operation time, hospitalization days, blood loss, incision length, drainage volume] were compared between the two groups. Oxidative stress-related factors [norepinephrine (NE), peroxyhydrogenase (Cor), total antioxidant capacity (TAC)] were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the incidence of postoperative complications as well as postoperative satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with group S, group V had less blood loss, drainage volume, and shorter incision length (P<0.05); the levels of NE, Cor, and TAC increased in both groups after surgery. Compared with those in group S, patients in group V had lower levels of NE, Cor, and TAC (P<0.05); the incidence of auricular greater nerve injury was the same in groups S and V. Group V had a lower incidence of Frey's syndrome and concave deformity of the surgical area compared with group S, and the overall incidence of complications was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05); compared with group S, group V patients had a higher rate of satisfaction with treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion: V incision surgery for the treatment of patients with benign tumors of the parotid gland reduces the volume of intraoperative blood loss, shortens the length of the incision, reduces the occurrence of complications, increases the patient satisfaction rate, and has a better cosmetic outcome.

Key words： V-incision surgery Benign tumors of the parotid gland S incision surgery Frey syndrome

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2021.10.025 OR http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/Y2021/V27/I10/1701

[1] Psychogios G,Bohr C,Constantinidis J,et al.Review of surgical techniques and guide for decision making in the treatment of benign parotid tumors[J].Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2021,278(1):15~29.
[2] Su J,Li P,Ji XB,et al.Clinical value of V-shaped concealed incision in parotid benign tumors[J].Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi,2019,33(7):615~618.
[3] Jo MG,Lee DJ,Cha W.A modified V-shaped incision combined with superficial musculo-aponeurotic system flap for parotidectomy[J].Acta Otolaryngol,2019,139(2):178~183.
[4] Li MM,Li SS,Tang QL,et al.Feasibility and efficacy of partial superficial parotidectomy with V-shaped incision[J].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi,2020,55(7):658~663.
[5] Guan B,Tan X,Li Y,et al.Planning minimal access incisions in resectioning benign parotid tumors[J].Craniofac Surg,2020,31(7):2007~2011.
[6] 夏超,吕俊,蔡俊,等.腮腺良性肿瘤60例功能性外科治疗分析[J].人民军医,2020,63(5):488~490.
[7] 赵永波.耳垂下小切口腮腺良性肿瘤切除术的疗效及对面神经功能的影响[J].中国实用医刊,2020,47(14):62~64.
[8] 苏娟,李鹏,吉晓滨,等.V形隐蔽切口在腮腺良性肿瘤手术中的应用价值[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2019,33(7):615~618.
[9] 余卓,黎伟,覃李玲,等.微创小切口对腮腺后下极良性肿瘤患者TNF-α、IL-6的影响[J].现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2020,4(1):29~30.
[10] 李蒙蒙,李仕晟,唐青来,等.耳周V形切口腮腺浅叶切除术可行性及疗效观察[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2020,55(7):658~663.
[11] 刘占东,安琪,马二奎,等.多排螺旋CT双期扫描对腮腺良性肿瘤的诊断价值[J].临床医学研究与实践,2021,6(10):112~114.
[12] Kuriyama T,Kawata R,Higashino M,et al.Recurrent benign pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland:Facial nerve identification and risk factors for facial nerve paralysis at re-operation[J].Auris Nasus Larynx,2019,46(5):779~784.
[13] 成昌德.腮腺良性肿瘤手术切除术的临床研究[J].全科口腔医学杂志(电子版),2019,6(1):155.