|
|
Efficacy and Safety Analysis of BiPAP Non-Invasive Ventilator in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD |
GAO Ya, LI Xiang, ZHOU Xiaojing |
Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100055, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To study the application effect and safety of bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) non-invasive ventilator in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) patients in the phase of exacerbation. Methods: A retrospective analysis method was adopted. The study objects were 120 patients with COPD in the phase of acute exacerbation who admitted from June 2016 to June 2019. They were divided into control group and study group according to different treatment methods, 60 cases in each; the control group received conventional treatment, and the study group was administrated BiPAP non-invasive ventilator therapy based on conventional treatment. The blood gas analysis indicators (arterial oxygen pressure, carbon dioxide partial pressure), and D-dimer were compared between the two groups before and after treatment , E-selectin levels and the total effective rate after treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions (dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea). Results: After treatment, the arterial blood oxygen partial pressure, carbon dioxide partial pressure, D-dimer, hs-CRP, total effective rate and incidence of adverse reactions were (95.14±12.31) mmHg, (47.97±6.03) mmHg, (30.09±4.97) μg/L, (13.68±8.15) mg/L, 96.67%, 5.00%, the indexes of the control group after treatment are (86.43±10.08) mmHg, (60.15±6.81) mmHg, (41.85±5.22) μg/L, (19.25±10.25) mg/L, 85.00%, 6.67%. Compared with the control group, the study group had higher arterial blood oxygen partial pressure and total effective rate, and lower carbon dioxide partial pressure, D-dimer, and hs-CRP levels (P<0.05); the incidence of adverse reactions after treatment in both groups was not different (P>0.05). Conclusion: BiPAP non-invasive ventilator has a significant effect in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. It can effectively improve the blood gas index of patients, reduce the inflammatory response, and has fewer adverse reactions and high safety.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 何梅,于素娥,洪光朝,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期进行呼吸康复对健康相关生存质量变化的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2018,33(6):514~516. [2] 王银燕,施荣华,林志敏,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者机械通气撤机前膈肌收缩功能的研究[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2019,28(5):174~175. [3] 蒋萍,杨春梅.无创智能模式平均容量保证压力支持在AECOPD伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭中的治疗作用[J].国际呼吸杂志,2019,39(24):1858~1862. [4] 中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病基层诊疗指南(2018年)[J].中华全科医师杂志,2018,17(11):856~870. [5] 张璐.CCU老年心力衰竭合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者使用无创呼吸机的安全管理[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2018(A02):153~155. [6] 陈伟丽.异丙托溴铵雾化吸入联合无创呼吸机对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者的疗效[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(17):3150~3151. [7] 张媛,刘前桂,赵黎黎,等.双水平无创正压通气治疗老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的临床疗效观察[J].山西医药杂志,2018,47(11):92~95. [8] 赵敏.无创呼吸机联合纳洛酮治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期呼吸衰竭患者的临床疗效[J].吉林医学,2017,38(11):2062~2063. |
|
|
|