|
|
|
| Effect Difference of Sequential nCPAP and High-flow Nasal Catheter Humidification Oxygen Therapy after Mechanical Ventilation Withdrawal in Neonatal Pneumonia with Respiratory Failure |
| HE Yanzhi, LI Yanjuan |
| Shiyan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Hubei Shiyan 442000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the efficacy of sequential nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) after weaning from mechanical ventilation on neonatal pneumonia with respiratory failure. Methods: A total of 110 children patients with neonatal pneumonia complicated with respiratory failure admitted to our hospital were divided into control group (55 cases) and observation group (55 cases) by simple randomization grouping according to the random number table method. Control group was given NCPAP treatment after weaning from mechanical ventilation, and observation group was given HHFNC treatment after weaning from mechanical ventilation. The clinical efficacy, blood gas analysis indicators and respiratory rate, oxygenation index, inflammatory factors, immune function indicators and complications were analyzed in the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the total effective rate of treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2), partial pressure of arterial blood carbon dioxide (PaCO2), blood oxygen saturation (SaO2), oxygenation index (P/F) and respiratory rate between the two groups (P>0.05). After 24h of treatment, the differences of SaO2 and P/F before and after treatment in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05), and there were no significant differences in the differences of other indicators compared with those in control group (P>0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of inflammatory factors [interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT)] and immune function indexes [immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM, IgG)] between the two groups (P>0.05). After 24h of treatment, the differences of inflammatory factors and immune function indexes before and after treatment in observation group were significantly greater than those in control group (P<0.05). During treatment, the incidence rate of complications in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Sequential HHFNC after weaning from mechanical ventilation has similar efficacy with NCPAP in the treatment of neonatal pneumonia with respiratory failure, but sequential HHFNC can effective improve the inflammatory response, enhance the immune function of children patients, and reduce the risk of complications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 杨惠华.重症肺炎并呼吸衰竭患儿动态无创肺动脉压力监测及临床意义[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2017,30(9):123~124.
[2] Nair N S, Lewis L E, Lakiang T, et al. Risk factors and barriers to case management of neonatal pneumonia: protocol for a pan-India qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(9): e017403.
[3] 李欢欢,朱兴旺,汪万军,等.无创高频振荡通气在早产儿有创机械通气撤机后呼吸支持效果的随机对照研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2019,41(17):1688~1692.
[4] 童兴瑜,尤纱纱,曹慧敏,等.湿化高流量鼻导管通气治疗儿科患者的临床研究进展[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2018,38(5):565~568.
[5] 周建国,陈超.无创通气技术在新生儿呼吸疾病中的应用[J].中华围产医学杂志,2017,20(1):65~68.
[6] 孔萤,王杨,戴立英,等.无创高频通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸衰竭中的疗效对比[J].重庆医学,2019,48(6):973~975,979.
[7] Jiang W,Wu M,Zhou J,et al.Etiologic spectrum and occurrence of coinfections in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia[J].BMC Infectious Diseases,2017,17(1):787.
[8] 王晓芳,刘玲.无创高频机械通气对呼吸衰竭新生儿肺氧合能力、CO2潴留和酸中毒的影响[J].天津医药,2019,47(11):1161~1165.
[9] 王柱,向建文,高薇薇,等.两种无创呼吸支持治疗极低出生体重儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2018,20(8):603~607. |
| [1] |
. [J]. HeBei Med, 2020, 26(6): 1002-1004. |
|
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 26 
