|
|
The Influence of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy on the Trauma Stress and Prognosis of Colon Cancer Patients |
TIAN Bin, et al |
Jianyang People's Hospital, Sichuan Jianyang 646100, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To analyze the influence of laparoscopy and laparotomy on the trauma stress and prognosis of colon cancer patients. Methods: 96 patients with colorectal cancer admitted to the hospital from August 2012 to March 2015 were selected for study. They were divided into minimally invasive group (laparoscopic surgery)and open surgery group(open surgery) according to simple random grouping method. The operation related indexes, trauma stress indexes, complications and prognosis related indexes of the two groups were compared. Results: In the minimally invasive group, the bleeding volume was lower than that in the open group, the incision length was shorter than that in the open group, and the anal recovery time was earlier than that in the open group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time, lymphadenectomy and hospitalization time (P>0.05). The levels of aldosterone, cortisol and adrenaline in the minimally invasive group were lower than those in the open group on the 1st, 3rd and 5th day after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications and the incidence of different types of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). One case of anastomotic leakage and two cases of intestinal obstruction in the open group were cured by operation, and the other complications improved after conservative treatment. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05), 5 patients in the minimally invasive group lost the visit, 9 patients in the open group lost the visit. There was no significant difference in 5-year local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, overall survival rate and tumor free survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The prognosis of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is similar to that of open surgery, but the trauma stress caused by surgery is less
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李红平,苏薇,狄连君,等.2127例大肠癌临床发病特点的回顾性分析[J].肿瘤防治研究,2017,44(12):836~839. [2] 郑达武,罗永香,江款,等.三种指标联合检测在结肠癌患者术后胃肠道感染中的临床诊断作用研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2019,29(6):888~892. [3] Liu Z, Zhou T, Yang G, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted and minilaparotomy approaches for colon cancer.[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2017, 49(2):1~9. [4] Mario S, Beatrice P, Francesco C, et al. Gut barrier function and systemic endotoxemia after laparotomy or laparoscopic resection for colon cancer: a prospective randomized study[J]. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, 2016, 12(3):254~259. [5] 刘菁.腹腔镜与开腹结肠癌手术对肠道屏障功能的影响对比[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(8):667~670. [6] 张洪典,尚晓滨,朱晓雷,等.淋巴结清扫数目对食管鳞癌患者预后的影响分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2018,17(8):817~824. [7] 陈庆永,帅晓明,陈立波.中间尾侧联合入路行腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫加完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌合并不全性肠梗阻的安全性和可行性[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(9):1039~1044. [8] Albitar Z B, Alahmad H T. Anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms in orthognathic surgery patients[J]. European Journal of Orthodontics, 2016, 39(1):92~97. [9] Kok L, Sep M S, Veldhuijzen D S, et al. Trait anxiety mediates the effect of stress exposure on post-traumatic stress disorder and depression risk in cardiac surgery patients[J]. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2016, 206(35):216~223. [10] 胡立群,李利,付金松,等.竖脊肌平面阻滞联合喉罩保留自主呼吸在胸腔镜肺叶切除术麻醉中的应用[J].河北医学,2019,25(3):559~563. [11] 董盛龙,等.超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞对结肠癌开腹手术患者循环应激及术后镇痛的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2017,33(2):259~262. [12] 陈中英,张占英.单唾液酸四己糖神经节苷脂钠治疗脑外伤手术患者对改善应激反应及炎症因子水平的影响[J].贵州医药,2017,41(7):720~722. [13] Ouyang R, Ren H, Liu W, et al. Remifentanil inhibits the traumatic stress response in emergent trauma surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 2019,33(8):e22971. [14] 邱东达.比较腹腔镜手术与常规开腹手术对右半结肠癌切除术后创伤应激的影响[J].结直肠肛门外科,2018,19(1):31~34. [15] Haksal M, Ozdenkaya Y, Atici A E, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery in patients with previous vertical abdominal laparotomy[J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2015, 21(5):97~102. |
|
|
|