锁定钢板固定与普通解剖钢板固定在胫骨平台骨折患者治疗中的临床疗效及生活质量比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2017.10.004

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (1373 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To investigate the comparison of locking plate fixation and common anatomical plate fixation in the treatment of fracture of tibial plateau with clinical efficacy and quality of life. Methods: 82 patients with fracture of tibial plateau from department of orthopedics in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the experiment group, 41cases in each group. Two groups were both received limb traction, swelling and rehydration and other conventional treatment methods, epidural anesthesia was performed before operation in the two groups. The experiment group were treated by locking plate fixation and the control group were treated by ordinary anatomical plate fixation. The clinical efficacy, quality of life, joint mobility and postoperative complications were compared. Results: Compared with the control group after treatment, the clinical total effective rate were higher in the experiment group, the quality of life and joint mobility were higher. Compared with the control group, the incidence of postoperative complications in control group (9.76%) was higher than that in the experiment group (31.71%). Conclusion: Locking plate fixation was higher than that of the normal anatomic plate fixation compared, in tibial plateau fractures treatment of patients with clinical curative effect significantly, effectively improve the quality of life of patients and joint activities is ideal for tibial plateau fractures.

Key words： Locking plate fixation Common anatomical plate fixation Tibial plateau fracture

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2017.10.004 OR http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/Y2017/V23/I10/1595

[1]Jost B, Spross C, Grehn H, et al. Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome[J].Shoulder Elb Surg, 2013, 22(4): 542~549.
[2] Streubel P N, Moustoukas M J, Obremskey W T. Mechanical failure after locking plate fixation of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures[J].Orthop Trauma, 2013, 27(1): 22~28.
[3] Ruchholtz S, El-Zayat B, Kreslo D, et al. Less invasive polyaxial locking plate fixation in periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures of the femur-a prospective study of 41 patients[J].Injury, 2013, 44(2): 239~248.
[4] Johnson N A, Cutler L, Dias J J, et al. Complications after volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures[J].Injury, 2014, 45(3): 528~533.
[5] Graham S M, Moazen M, Leonidou A, et al. Locking plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a critical analysis of 135 cases[J].Orthop Sci, 2013, 18(3): 426~436.
[6] Rhee S H, Kim J, Lee Y H, et al. Factors affecting late displacement following volar locking plate fixation for distal radial fractures in elderly female patients[J].Bone Joint, 2013, 95(3): 396~400.
[7] Moazen M, Mak J H, Etchels L W, et al. The effect of fracture stability on the performance of locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures[J].Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(9): 1589~1595.
[8] Walenkamp M M J, Bentohami A, Beerekamp M S H, et al. Functional outcome in patients with unstable distal radius fractures, volar locking plate versus external fixation: a meta-analysis[J].Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstruction, 2013, 8(2): 67~75.
[9] Chen S H, Chiang M C, Hung C H, et al. Finite element comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation with/without an intramedullary allograft for distal femur fracture following total knee arthroplasty[J].Knee, 2014, 21(1): 224~231.
[10] Karantana A, Downing N D, Forward D P, et al. Surgical treatment of distal radial fractures with a volar locking plate versus conventional percutaneous methods[J].Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(19): 1737~1744.
[11] Lee S K, Lee J W, Song D G, et al. Precontoured locking plate fixation for displaced lateral clavicle fractures[J].Orthopedics, 2013, 36(6): 801~807.
[12] Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Zambianchi F, et al. Volar plate fixation for the treatment of distal radius fractures: analysis of adverse events[J].Orthop Trauma, 2013, 27(12): 740~745.
[13] Gradl G, Knobe M, Stoffel M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures augmented with calcium phosphate cement[J].Orthopaedic Trauma, 2013, 27(7): 399~404.
[14] Kumar C, Gupta A K, Nath R, et al. Open reduction and locking plate fixation of displaced proximal humerus fractures[J].Indian Orthop, 2013, 47(2): 156.
[15] Esenwein P, Sonderegger J, Gruenert J, et al. Complications following palmar plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a review of 665 cases[J].Arch Orthop Traum Su, 2013, 133(8): 1155~1162.
[16] Ebraheim N A, Sochacki K R, Liu X, et al. Locking plate fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with and without cerclage wires[J].Orthop Surg, 2013, 5(3): 183~187.