|
|
Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Prognosis of Patients with Multiple Thyroid Nodules treated by Total Thyroidectomy and Subtotal Thyroidectomy |
WANG Naijin, YING Haojie, SHI Jin, et al |
Zibo Hospital in 960 Hospital of PLA, Shandong Zibo 255300, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy and prognosis effects of patients with multiple thyroid nodules treated by total thyroidectomy and subtotal thyroidectomy. Methods:Ninety patients with multiple thyroid nodules in our hospital from March 2016 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into total thyroidectomy group (n = 45) and subtotal thyroidectomy group (n = 45). Total thyroidectomy group was treated by total thyroidectomy, and subtotal thyroidectomy group was treated by subtotal thyroidectomy. The clinical efficacy and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results:The operative time and total hospital stay in total thyroidectomy group were longer than those in subtotal thyroidectomy group, and the length of incision was longer than that in subtotal thyroidectomy group, and the usage amount of analgesics was more than that in subtotal thyroidectomy group (P<0.05). The postoperative thyroid function indexes of free triiodothyronine (FT3) and free thyroxine (FT4) in total thyroidectomy group were lower than those in subtotal thyroidectomy group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in parathyroid gland function indexes between the two groups before and after surgery (P>0.05). The incidence rate of complications in total thyroidectomy group was higher than that in subtotal thyroidectomy group (17.78% vs 4.44%) (P<0.05). At 1 year after operation,the recurrence rate of total resection group was lower than that of subtotal resection group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions:Subtotal thyroidectomy for patients with multiple thyroid nodules has less damage to their thyroid function and lower incidence of complications, while total thyroidectomy for patients with multiple thyroid nodules has lower recurrence rate. Both methods have their own advantages
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘玉辉,孙均,王松涛,等.老年人甲状腺结节手术切除和微波消融临床疗效和安全性对比分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2016,25(1):44~47. [2] 王龙琦,陈坚,刘绪舜.微波消融术与传统开放手术在良性甲状腺结节治疗中对机体创伤影响的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(3):236~240. [3] 金海龙,周予民,潘炯,等.甲状腺下动脉结扎方式对甲状腺次全切除术后甲状旁腺功能的影响[J].疑难病杂志,2016,15(4):378~380. [4] 高峰,吴迟.传统甲状腺切除术与改良小切口甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺结节的临床疗效比较[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2016,23(5):514~516. [5] 黄华俊,张永康.甲状腺全切除和次全切除术对甲状腺癌的治疗效果及安全性的比较[J].实用癌症杂志,2016,31(9):1531~1533. [6] 张斌,姜鹏,郭慕红.甲状腺全切除术与甲状腺次全切除术治疗双侧结节性甲状腺肿的疗效比较[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(19):125~126. |
|
|
|