|
|
|
| Clinical Analysis of 50 Cases of Cholelithiasis Treated by Laparoscopic Choledocholithotomy with Nephroscope |
| HUANG Jintuan, CHEN Yexi |
| Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Shantou 515000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic choledocholithotomy using a rigid nephroscope in the treatment of 50 cases of cholelithiasis. Methods: A total of 100 patients with cholelithiasis admitted to the department of General Surgery of the Third People's Hospital of Hui Zhou were divided into observation group and control group according to random number table. Patients in observation group were treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic choledocholithotomy performed using a rigid nephroscope, while those in control group were treated with traditional open operation. The total effective rate, operation duration, length of stay, time of postoperative anal exhaust, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, intraoperative bleeding, incident rates of postoperative complications, and the recurrence rate between the two groups were compared. Results: The total effective rate of clinical efficacy in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (96.00%). The operation duration, length of stay, time of postoperative anal exhaust, and postoperative drainage tube indwelling time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those in control group (P<0.05). The intraoperative bleeding was significantly less in the observation group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of stones between the two groups (P> 0.05), while the incident rates of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the observation group (2.00%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic choledocholithotomy using a rigid nephroscope has higher effective rate, lower incident rates of postoperative complications, and causes less damage in the treatment of cholelithiasis, which are beneficial to the recovery of patients and makes it worth generalizing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈积圣.肝胆管结石的微创治疗的进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,7(2):93~94.
[2] 孙蕾,刘志刚,胡郁之,等.腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗肝外胆道结石的临床分析[J].肝胆外科杂志,2016,24(4):285~287.
[3] 袁锋.三镜联合手术方案治疗肝外胆道结石患者的临床疗效及预后情况分析[J].四川医学,2017,38(07):785~787.
[4] 熊勇,王心吉,宪源,等.腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创治疗胆道结石的临床应用分析[J].中国医学创新,2012,05(34):29~30.
[5] Lamberts MP,Lugtenberg M,Rovers MM,et al.Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: asystematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness[J].Surg Endosc,2013,27(3):709~718.
[6] Kong J,Wu SD,Xian GZ,et al.Complications analysis with postoperative choledochoscopy for residual bile duct stones[J].World Surg,2015,34(3):574~580.
[7] Sheen-Chen SM,Chou FF.Intraoperative choledochoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy for difficulty retrieved impacted common bile duct stones[J].2015,130(4):430~432.
[8] Jakobsen HL,Vilmann P,Rosenberg J.Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2011,21(6):450~452.
[9] 张庆凯,尚东.多镜联合在胆道结石治疗中的应用[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017,33(04):651~655.
[10] 白明,黎万松,黄静翔,等.肾镜联合腹腔镜微创保胆取石术的临床体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2013,18(3):196~197. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 24 
