前后联合入路手术治疗经鹰嘴肘关节骨折脱位患者的临床分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2018.04.035

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1318 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To discuss the clinical efficacy of combined anterior and posterior approach surgery in the treatment of transolecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow. Methods: 36 patients with transolecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow treated in the hospital from January 2015 to March 2017 were selected as study subjects, and they were divided into the control group and the study group with 18 cases in each group by the random number table method. The control group was treated by elbow posterior open reduction and internal fixation while the study group was treated by combined anterior and posterior approach surgery. The general situation of surgery, fracture healing, recovery of elbow function (Broberg-Morrey function score) and the incidence of complications in the two groups after surgery were observed. Results:There was no significant difference in the surgical time between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing time of the study group [(26.49±3.28) mL, (6.09±1.18) weeks] were less or shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05). The fracture healing rate of the study group in 6 months after surgery was higher than that of the control group (100.00% vs 77.78%) (χ²=4.500, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Broberg-Morrey scores between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). After surgery, Broberg-Morrey scores of the two groups increased significantly, and the Broberg-Morrey scores of study group after surgery [(78.82±4.88), (85.34±5.36), (93.32±6.08)] were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group after surgery was significantly lower than that in the control group (27.78% vs 72.22%) (Test value=4.685, P<0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of combined anterior and posterior approach for the treatment of fracture and dislocation of the olecranon joint is clear, and it has clinical application value.

Key words： Transolecranon elbow Fracture dislocation Surgery Combined anterior and posterior approach Clinical efficacy

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Fudong
	YE Ruanchu
	LI Qingfeng

Cite this article:

LI Fudong,YE Ruanchu,LI Qingfeng. Clinical Analysis of Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach for the treatment of Fracture and Dislocation of the Olecranon Joint[J]. HeBei Med, 2018, 24(4): 657-660.

URL:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2018.04.035 OR http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/Y2018/V24/I4/657

[1] 都海,易泽洪,杨国齐,等.早期功能锻炼对肱骨下段骨折患者内固定术后肘关节功能的影响[J].海南医学,2015,23(5):719~721.
[2] 王晓龙,魏巍,王鹏飞,等.合并冠状突骨折的肘关节骨折脱位治疗进展[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2016,18(10):917~920.
[3] Syed J,Zamri A R,Jamaluddin S,et al.Intra-articular entrapment of medial epicondyle fracture fragment in elbow joint dislocation causing ulnar neuropraxia:a case report[J].Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal,2017,11(1):82~84.
[4] 任东,邢丹谋,冯伟,等.手术治疗肘关节异位骨化的疗效分析[J].中华手外科杂志,2016,32(3):169~170.
[5] 李存.前后联合入路下行关节切开复位、尺骨截骨术治疗儿童陈旧孟氏骨折[D].广西医科大学,2016.
[6] 张太良,杨晶,廉志明,等.铰链式外固定架结合VSD治疗复杂开放性肘关节骨折脱位[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(14):1338~1340.
[7] 蒋正武,赵越.直接肘关节外侧入路治疗肘关节恐怖三联征的体会[J].山东医药,2015,31(4):36~38.
[8] 董洪先,黄富国.尺骨冠状突前内侧骨折与肘关节外侧副韧带复合体损伤对肘关节后内侧旋转稳定性影响的生物力学研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,16(2):176~179.
[9] 鲍剑峰,米明珊,梁小弟,等.前后联合入路治疗儿童颈椎重度骨折脱位[J].中国现代医学杂志,2014,24(35):84~87.
[10] 衡立松,张军,朱养均,等.前后路联合手术治疗尺骨鹰嘴并冠状突骨折[J].实用骨科杂志,2016,22(2):111~114.
[11] 杜英勋,周方伦,刘志英,等.肘关节后侧入路手术治疗经鹰嘴肘关节骨折脱位[J].浙江临床医学,2014,17(2):253~254.
[12] 齐岩,田军,姚宇,等.解剖型锁定加压接骨板修复尺骨鹰嘴骨折:肘关节功能6个月随访评价[J].中国组织工程研究,2015,19(4):573~577.
[13] 杨如意,周雨,刘立峰,等.后内侧双钢板治疗复杂尺骨鹰嘴骨折的疗效观察[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2016,28(12):1462~1466.