|
|
|
| Analysis on the Influence of Traditional Brackets and Self-ligating Brackets on the Shape of Dental Arch for Crowded Patients with Maxillary Dentition |
| ZHANG Yuying |
| Jinzhou Central Hospital, Liaoning Jinzhou121000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective:To study the effect of traditional bracket and self-ligating bracket on the shape of dental arch in the treatment of crowded patients with maxillary dentition. Methods:A total of 82 patients with maxillary dentition admitted to our hospital from Feb. 2016 to Aug. 2017 were enrolled. All patients were divided into control group (n=36 cases) and study group (n=46). example). The patients in the control group were treated with traditional brackets, and the patients in the study group were treated with self-locking brackets. Comparing the upper and lower arch circumferences of the two groups of patients, the maxillary arch length index: the upper segment of the upper arch, the anterior segment of the upper arch, the middle segment of the upper arch, the entire segment of the lower arch, the anterior segment of the lower arch, the middle segment of the lower arch, etc. The maxillary arch width index: the first molar central fossa, the first molar cheek tip, the second premolar fovea, the second premolar cheek tip, the first premolar fovea, the first premolar cheek tip and the canine. Results:There was no significant difference in the circumference of the upper and lower arches between the two groups (P>0.05). The circumference of the upper and lower arches of the two groups were significantly higher than those before treatment (P<0.05), but there were statistical differences. There was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the indexes of the upper segment, the anterior segment, the middle segment, the lower segment of the lower arch, the anterior segment and the middle segment between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, each index was significantly higher than before treatment. There was a statistical difference (P<0.05); however, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The two groups of patients before treatment, the first molar central fossa, the first molar cheek tip, the second premolar fovea, the second premolar cheek tip, the first premolar fovea, the first premolar cheek tip and the canine and other maxillary teeth There was no significant difference in bow width index (P>0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the treatment of canines before treatment (P>0.05). There was no comparison between the two groups after treatment. Statistical difference (P>0.05). Conclusion:There is no significant difference between the traditional bracket and the self-locking bracket on the circumference of the arch, the length of the arch and the width of the arch. Both treatment methods can increase the circumference of the arch, the length of the arch and the width of the arch, especially the width of the anterior and premolar regions. Therefore, in terms of expanding the dental arch, the self-locking bracket has no obvious advantage compared with the conventional straight wire bracket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 蒙红英,康娜,欧阳晖,等.3B自锁托槽系统和传统直丝托槽系统在排齐与整平阶段上颌牙弓宽度的变化[J].广西医科大学学报,2013,30(1):58~60.
[2] 刘东妮,高辉,肖丹娜,等.自锁托槽和传统托槽非拔牙矫治上颌轻中度拥挤软硬组织及牙弓变化的研究[J].天津医药,2014,42(6):605~609.
[3] 王亚楠,瞿杨,何淞.DamonQ自锁系统中运用双丝技术的转矩力学性能有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(33):4919~4925.
[4] 陈析华,华咏梅,谢兴潜.Empower自锁托槽治疗安氏Ⅱ拔牙病例的疗效评价[J].上海口腔医学,2013,22(3):316~321.
[5] 张东平,刘珺,刘洋,等.自锁托槽与传统托槽对非拔牙矫治牙弓宽度影响的meta分析[J].上海口腔医学,2014,23(3):367~372.
[6] 黄红亮,秦燕军,朱麒,等.自锁托槽与传统结扎式托槽非拔牙矫治牙列拥挤患者的下牙列变化的研究[J].医药卫生,2017,5(4):104~105.
[7] 蔡嘉喜,黄丹丹,温志新,等.无托槽隐形矫治技术在矫治牙列拥挤中的应用[J].现代医院,2015,15(5):65~66.
[8] 黄海燕.自锁托槽与非拔牙对牙列拥挤患者的矫治效果研究[J].中外医疗,2014,33(7):77,79.
[9] 刘潇.自锁托槽和传统结扎式托槽非拔牙矫治牙列拥挤的临床效果观察[J].医学理论与实践,2014,27(12):1621~1622. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 24 
