胸腔镜下经剑突肋缘下入路与经肋间入路纵隔肿物切除术近期疗效的比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2024.04.014

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download: PDF (1228 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To compare the short-term efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) trans-xiphoid subcostal and intercostal approaches for mediastinal tumor resection. Methods: A total of 157 patients who underwent thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection via the xiphoid process or intercostal approach in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2019 to January 2022 were selected. They were divided into the xiphoid process group (n=56) or intercostal group (n=102) according to the surgical approach. After propensity score matching, 52 patients were included in each group. The two groups were compared for surgery-related indicators [postoperative chest drainage volume, intraoperative blood loss, drainage tube indwelling time, operation time, bed rest time, number of self-pressing analgesia pumps, and hospitalization costs], postoperative complication rate, and pain level. Serum myoglobin (Mb), nerve growth factor (NGF), creatine phosphokinase (CPK), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels were measured using electrochemiluminescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before surgery, and on days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery. Results: The indwelling time of drainage tube (2.37±1.05) days, bed rest time (1.37±0.65) days, hospitalization time (6.07±1.82) days, intraoperative blood loss (72.26±9.41) ml, chest drainage volume (248.74±80.41) ml, the number of times of self-pressing the analgesia pump (3.72±0.98) times, and hospitalization costs (3.10±0.84) million yuan in the xiphoid group were less than those in the intercostal group (3.02±1.31) days, (1.92±0.70) days, (7.31±2.13) days, (85.33±12.69) ml, (325.96±95.22) ml, (8.41±2.17) times, and (3.76±1.22) million yuan (t=2.792, 4.152, 3.192, 5.966, 4.468, 14.204, 3.213, P<0.05); at 1 d, 3 d and 5 d after surgery, Mb, CPK, NGF and PGE2 in the xiphoid group were lower than those in the intercostal group (P<0.05); at 1 d, 7 d and 1 month, 3 months after surgery, the pain VAS scores in the xiphoid group were lower than those in the intercostal group (P<0.05); the incidence of complications in the xiphoid group was 1.92% (1/52), which was lower than that in the intercostal group (17.31%) (χ²=7.081, P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with thoracoscopic transcostal approach, transxiphoid subcostal approach for mediastinal mass resection can significantly reduce the degree of muscle injury and pain in patients, and the operation is safe and reliable, conducive to postoperative recovery of patients, and the hospitalization cost is relatively low.

Key words： Mediastinal mass Thoracoscopic surgery Xiphoid costal approach Intercostal approach Propensity matching

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIANG Guanbiao
	YANG Nuo
	LI Changqian
	et al

Cite this article:

LIANG Guanbiao,YANG Nuo,LI Changqian, et al. Comparison of Short-Term Efficacy of Mediastinal Tumor Resection via Subcostal Incision and Intercostal Approach under Thoracoscope[J]. HeBei Med, 2024, 30(4): 603-608.

URL:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2024.04.014 OR http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/Y2024/V30/I4/603

[1] Lin J,Jimenez CA.Acute mediastinitis,mediastinal granuloma,and chronic fibrosing mediastinitis:a review[J].Semin Diagn Pathol,2022,39(2):113-119.
[2] Hong JI,Lee JH,Kim HK.Biportal robotic surgery for anterior mediastinal mass[J].Ann Cardiothorac Surg,2023,12(2):110-116.
[3] Suarez-Cabrera F,Encinoso M,Artiles A,et al.A mediastinal mass causing Budd-Chiari-like syndrome in a cat[J].Iran Vet Res,2022,23(4):380-384.
[4] Jung Y,Hong JI,Han KN,et al.Thoracoscopic anterior mediastinal mass removal using an articulating laparoscopic instrument[J].Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2021,33(3):498-507.
[5] 耿鹏,王红芳,王喆歆,等.电凝钩用于胸腔镜下前纵隔肿瘤手术对手术时间和术后患者恢复速度的影响[J].实用癌症杂志,2021,36(1):152-154.
[6] 刘鹏,郝登荣,彭彦才,等.不同入路胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤的临床疗效对比研究[J].海南医学,2023,34(4):520-524.
[7] Mao Y,Liang H,Deng S,et al.Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery for subxiphoid anterior mediastinal tumor resection[J].Ann Transl Med,2021,9(5):403-411.
[8] Wu W,Chen C,Zheng W,et al.Safety of subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumour in obese patients[J].Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2021,16(2):377-381.
[9] He S,Renne A,Argandykov D,et al.Comparison of an emoji-based visual analog scale with a numeric rating scale for pain assessment[J].JAMA,2022,328(2):208-209.
[10] Pham LH,Trinh DK,Nguyen AV,et al.Thoracoscopic surgery approach to mediastinal mature teratomas:a single-center experience[J].Cardiothorac Surg,2020,15(1):35-39.
[11] Cho S.Video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy:subxiphoid approach[J].Chest Surg,2021,54(4):314-318.
[12] Wu CF,Cheng C,Suen KH,et al.A preclinical feasibility study of single-port robotic subcostal anatomical lung resection and subxiphoid thymectomy using the da Vinci^® SPsystem[J].Diagnostics (Basel),2023,13(3):460-468.
[13] 禹德富,梁璃汇,黄圣杰.经剑突下入路和经肋间入路单孔胸腔镜肺大疱切除术的临床疗效对比[J].局解手术学杂志,2022,31(1):48-51.