|
|
Effects of Ultrasound-Guided MMT Minimally Invasive Rotational Resection on Perioperative Indicators Postoperative Pain Scarring and Complications in Women with Benign Breast Masses |
ZHOU Ying, LIU Tao |
The Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan Chengdu 610072, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the effects of ultrasound-guided MMT minimally invasive rotational resection on perioperative indicators, postoperative pain, scarring and complications of benign breast masses in women. Methods: The clinical data of 126 patients with benign breast masses who were treated in the hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into MMT group and conventional group. The 71 cases in MMT group underwent ultrasound-guided MMT minimally invasive rotational resection, and the 55 cases in conventional group were treated with traditional open surgery. The perioperative indicators (surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, incision healing time) and postoperative pain [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 2, 8 and 24 hours after surgery] were compared between the two groups. The patients were followed up for 3 months after surgery, and the scars [scar length, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS)] and differences in occurrence of complications were compared. Results: The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, incision healing time, VAS scores at various postoperative time periods, various indicators of scar conditions and total incidence rate of complications were all shorter or lower in MMT group compared to conventional group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided MMT minimally invasive rotational resection for female patients with benign breast masses compared with conventional surgery can enhance the surgical efficiency, reduce the surgical trauma and shorten the postoperative recovery process, improve the postoperative pain, and reduce the scar formation and risk of complications.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 杨健,李星云,刘秋霞,等.彩色多普勒超声对乳腺与甲状腺疾病诊断的相关性分析[J].中华全科医学,2019,17(11):1886-1888,1960. [2] 杨波,唐诗,曾鸿,等.超声引导下麦默通旋切活检术对乳腺癌诊断价值的临床研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(4):929-931. [3] 黄辉文,戚子荣,丘青中.膝三脏汤合并中药外洗对膝骨关节炎患者Lysholm膝关节评分及VAS评分的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2018,27(13):1399-1401,1406. [4] 王镜涵,白欣冉,董彦慧,等.A型肉毒素与曲安奈德治疗瘢痕疙瘩的长期疗效对比[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2019,33(10):1149-1152. [5] 梁娴,刘光清,符川,等.超声引导微创旋切术与开放性手术在乳腺肿瘤治疗中的应用价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2020,36(3):201-204. [6] 陈梓淼,任利成.自体脂肪移植结合假体置入在乳腺癌改良根治术后乳房重建中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2022,31(5):64-67. [7] 栗辰,解云涛.真空辅助微创旋切系统在乳腺良性疾病中的应用进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(3):265-267,271. [8] 黄方杰.开放性手术与超声引导微创旋切术在乳腺肿瘤中的价值[J].数理医药学杂志,2021,34(5):647-649. [9] 雷鹏举,王石.探讨乳腺良性肿瘤病人超声引导下麦默通乳腺微创旋切术治疗的临床效果[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2020,42(2):202-204. [10] 谢雨芹,邓爽,邓倩,等.超声引导下微创乳腺麦默通旋切系统治疗多发性乳腺肿块临床分析[J].中国临床医生杂志,2021,49(1):79-81. |
|
|
|