|
|
Efficacy of Stage I Three-dDimensional External Fixator System Combined with Stage Ⅱ Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Gustilo Type Ⅲ Open Tibiofibular Fractures and the Influence on Functional Recovery |
YANG Haidong, CHEN Qiming |
Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Guangdong Huizhou 516000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the efficacy of stage I three-dimensional external fixator system combined with stage Ⅱ internal fixation in the treatment of Gustilo type Ⅲ open tibiofibular fractures, and the influence on lower limb function recovery. Methods: From April 2017 to April 2021, 93 patients with Gustilo type Ⅲ open tibiofibular fractures underwent surgical treatment in the hospital. The patients were randomly divided into conventional group (45 cases) and combined group (48 cases) using the method of random number table. The operation-related indicators, clinical effect, lower limb function recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The total operation time, postoperative hospital stay and fracture healing time of the combined group were shorter than those of the conventional group (P<0. 05), and the clinical effect was better than that of the conventional group (P<0. 05). The American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and American Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups before operation (P>0. 05). At 6 months after operation, the AOFAS scores and HSS scores were increased in the two groups, and the combined group had higher score difference than the conventional group (P<0. 05). The incidence of total complications in the combined group was lower than that in the conventional group (P<0. 05). Conclusion: Stage I three-dimensional external fixator system combined with stage Ⅱ internal fixation for treating Gustilo type Ⅲ open tibiofibular fractures can reduce time cost, improve clinical effect, and better restore the patients' lower limb function, with fewer postoperative complications.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Malhotra R,Goh AQY,Gardner AW.Posterolateral plating of distal tibia fractures:extending the use of a familiar approach[J].Indian Orthop,2021,55(Suppl 2):426-435. [2] Omar M,Zeckey C,Krettek C,et al.Open fractures[J].Unfallchirurg,2021,124(8):651-665. [3] Futamura K,Sato R,Hasegawa M,et al.A gustilo ⅢB open tibial fracture complicated by a huge bone defect and larger soft tissue defect:a case report[J].Orthop Sci,2021,3(21):347. [4] 张松强,巨积辉,邓伟,等.外固定支架联合股前外侧肌皮瓣治疗GustiloⅢB/C型开放性胫腓骨骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2021,37(3):216-221. [5] 中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组,中华医学会骨科学分会外固定与肢体重建学组,中国医师协会创伤外科医师分会创伤感染专业委员会,等.中国开放性骨折诊断与治疗指南(2019版)[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(11):921-928. [6] 林洲,林帆,郑均炬,等.不同固定方式对GustiloⅢA-B型开放性胫骨骨折患者影响研究[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(22):3940-3941. [7] Aljawadi A,Islam A,Jahangir N,et al.One-stage combined "fix and flap" approach for complex open gustilo-anderson ⅢB lower limbs fractures:a prospective review of 102 cases[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2022,142(3):425-434. [8] 徐建强,周密,刘琳琳,等.分期手术治疗Gustilo Ⅲ型小腿开放性骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(2):178-180. [9] 贺杰,任洪峰,李欢乐,等.新型三维外固定架系统联合内固定治疗Gustilo Ⅲ型胫腓骨开放性骨折的疗效分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2021,18(4):49-53. [10] 张勇华,李竖飞,朱国权.外固定支架联合有限内固定分期治疗GustiloⅢ型胫腓骨开放性骨折的疗效[J].广州医科大学学报,2019,47(4):75-78. |
|
|
|