|
|
|
| Comparative Study of CT 3D Reconstruction Two-dimensional CT and X-ray Diagnosis of Tile Classification of Pelvic Fractures |
| SHEN Honglei, FENG Dehong, XU Hongjun, et al |
| The People's Hospital of Wuxi, Jiangsu Wuxi 214023, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To compare the value of 64 slice spiral CT three dimensional reconstruction in Tile classification of pelvic fractures. Methods: From January 2017 to June 2018, 51 patients with pelvic fractures were selected as subjects. All patients were examined by X-ray, two-dimensional CT and CT three-dimensional reconstruction. The diagnostic results of the three methods were compared according to the gold standard of surgical diagnosis. Results: According to the gold standard, there were 9 cases of Tile A type, 30 cases of B type and 12 cases of C type in 51 patients. The diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional CT reconstruction for Tile classification was 100.00%, significantly higher than that of X-ray scanning (74.51%) and two-dimensional CT (88.34%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Both X-ray scan and two-dimensional CT were in good agreement with the gold standard (к = 0.696, 0.859, P<0.001). CT three-dimensional reconstruction is fully consistent with the gold standard test results. Conclusion: CT three-dimensional reconstruction is superior to two-dimensional CT and X-ray scan in judging Tile classification of pelvic fracture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 叶博闻,王秋根.骨盆骨折流行病学研究进展[J].中华全科医学,2014,12(1):119~121.
[2] 黎清斌,张兆华,劳永锵,等.骨盆骨折3种分型的可信度和可重复性比较[J].重庆医学,2017,46(25):3539~3541.
[3] 郑尚斗,林建征.多层螺旋CT三维重建与X线平片检查骨盆骨折的临床价值分析[J].医学影像学杂志,2015,25(1):184~186.
[4] LI B, CHEN B, ZHANG Y, et al. Comparative use of the computer-aided angiography and rapid prototyping technology versus conventional imaging in the management of the Tile C pelvic fractures[J]. Int Orthop, 2016, 40(1): 161~166.
[5] Stieger-vanegas SM, Senthirajah SK, Nemanic S, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography for assessing canine sacral and pelvic fractures by radiologists, orthopedic surgeons and veterinary medical students[J]. Vet Surg, 2015, 44(6): 694~703.
[6] Yun SJ, Jin W, Yoon SH, et al. Diagnostic performance of abdominal CT for diagnosis of pelvic fractures: comparison with pelvic CT[J]. Acta Radiol, 2016, 57(10): 1244~1250.
[7] 黄俭,吴玮伟,陈路遥,等.256排CT检查与Mimics软件结合在骨盆骨折临床应用的初步研究[J].中国临床研究,2015,28(7):905~907. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 25 
