|
|
|
| Clinical Observation of Different Surgical Repair of Inguinal Hernia in Adults |
| XIAO Qiang, ZENG Jun, LIANG Haifei, et al |
| The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Guangzhou 511518, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the clinical effect and safety of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), totally exntraperitoneal prosthesis (TEP) and open tension free hernia repair (Rutkow) in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia. Methods: Clinical data of 936 cases (1116 sides) of adult inguinal hernia treated in our hospital from January 2009 to January 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into TAPP group, TEP group and open group, according to different treatment methods, 152 cases (174 sides), 336 cases (449 sides) and 448 cases (493 sides), respectively. The operation time, the VAS pain score at first day of postoperative, length of stay, postoperative complications of two groups were observed. After 6～40 months (media 21 months) follow up, the recurrence of two groups were observed. Results: Operation time: unilateral hernia: TAPP group > TEP group > open group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Bilateral hernia: TAPP and open group > TEP group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), there was no significant difference between the TAPP group and the open group (P > 0.05). Length of stay: the open group was significantly longer than the TAPP group and TEP group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between the TAPP group and the TEP group (P > 0.05). Incidence of complications: open group > TAPP group and TEP group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), there was no significant difference between TAPP group and TEP group (P > 0.05). The recurrence rate of open group was 0.89%, the recurrence rate of TAPP group was 0.66%, the recurrence rate of TEP group was 0.60%, and there was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the three groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative urinary retention, chronic pain or numbness in the open group were higher than those in the TAPP group and TEP group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: TAPP and TEP in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia is satisfactory, especially in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernia, can significantly reduce the degree of postoperative pain, shorten the length of stay, reduce postoperative urinary retention, chronic pain or numbness, and other complications
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Kapiris SA, Bruogh WA, Royston CM, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients[J].Surg Endosc,2001,15(9): 972~975.
[2] European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J].Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 343~403.
[3] Tolver MA, Strandfelt P, Rosenberg J, et al. Pain characteristics after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J].Surg Endosc, 2011, 25 (12): 3859~3864.
[4] Dion Y M, Morin J. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy[J].Can Surg,1992,35(2):209~212.
[5] Mc Kernan JB, Laws HL. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach[J].Surg Endosc,1993,7(1):26~28.
[6] 中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2014,34(6):484~486.
[7] Gillion JF, Chollet JM. Chronic pain and quality of life ( QoL) after transinguinalpreperitoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair using a totally extraperitoneal, parietalized, Polysoft memory ring patch :a series of 622 hernia repairs in 525 patients[J].Hernia, 2013, 17(6): 683~692.
[8] 中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术常规[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2006, 11(2): 179~180.
[9] 王明刚. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片植入术治疗复发性腹股沟疝技术探讨[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(11):1172~1174.
[10] 姚琪远.腹腔镜疝修补手术常见并发症及处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(9): 708~710.
[11] 李健文, 王映昌, 张凌捷, 等. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术在我国逐步推广的可行性探讨[J].外科理论与实践 2010, 15(6):611~615.
[12] 陈双, 宗振. 应用腹腔镜技术诊治疝和腹壁外科疾病利弊思考[J].中华实用外科杂志,2015,35(11):1150~1152. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 23 
