|
|
|
| Analysis of the Application of Bridging Combined System for Femoral Shaft Fractures in School-Age Children |
| NIAN Zhenghao, et al |
| Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Anhui Suzhou 234000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the effect of bridging combination system on femoral shaft fractures in school-age children. Methods: A total of 85 pediatric patients with femoral shaft fracture admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 were selected for study. By random number table, they were divided into study group (43 cases) and control group (42 cases) by simple random method. The control group was treated with locking compression plate fixation and the study group was treated with a bridging combination system. The surgical data, fracture healing time and complications of the two groups were compared. The Johner-Wruh functional evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the limb function of the two groups 6 months after surgery. Results: There was no significant difference in incision length between the two groups (P>0.05), but the operation time, blood loss and postoperative drainage volume of the study group were significantly less than that of the control group (P<0.05), the fracture healing time of the study group was shorter than that of the control group, and the incidence of complications was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The optimal rate of Johner-Wruh function in the study group was 88.37%, which was higher than 47.62% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The bridging combination fixation system has obvious effect in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in school-age children, with short healing time and rare complications. It also has a positive effect on postoperative limb function recovery and has high application value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Li J,Rai S,Ze R,et al.Distal third femoral shaft fractures in school-aged children A comparative study of elastic stable intramedullary nail and external fixator[J].Medicine,2020,99(27):21053.
[2] 任东,邢丹谋,张明.桥接组合内固定系统与锁定钉板系统治疗闭合性肱骨干骨折的疗效比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2022,42(3):156-163.
[3] 孙球,熊雪梅,诸葛天瑜,等.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗复杂股骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2020,32(1):69-71.
[4] 段洪凯,赵湘军,高飞,等.弹性髓内钉内固定治疗儿童股骨干骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(4):392-394.
[5] 魏文卿,崔海坡,陈舰,等.不同固定方式对股骨颈骨折固定效果的影响[J].医用生物力学,2020,35(2):216-222.
[6] 孙再杰,杨思宇,汪国栋,等.锁定加压钢板钉孔与螺钉不同组合方式对骨折端轴向微动的影响[J].中华创伤杂志,2020,36(4):341-346.
[7] 施立奇,李象钧,赵俊,等.关节镜下锁定加压钢板治疗SchatzkerⅠ~Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2021,24(2):231-231.
[8] 李栋,周维波,朱春晖,等.桥接组合式内固定系统和锁定钢板系统治疗股骨干骨折的疗效比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(9):807-811.
[9] Feeley A,Feeley I,CN Fhoghlu,et al.Use of biomaterials in scaphoid fracture fixation,a systematic review[J].Clinical biomechanics (Bristol,Avon),2021,89(1):105480. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 29 
