|
|
Effects of Different Administration Methods of Oxycodone on the Level of Pain-Causing Substances and Bladder Spasm Pain in Patients After TURP |
ZHOU Xuehui, SHAO Guoli, PENG Liyan, et al |
Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Guangzhou 510000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the effects of different administration methods of oxycodone on the level of pain-causing substances and bladder spasm pain in patients after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Methods: Researchers retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 116 TURP patients admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to March 2021, and divided them into groups A, B, and C according to their different administration methods. 45 patients in group A adopting patient self-control intravenous analgesia (patient controlled intravenous analgesia, PCIA) were continuously pumped. 37 patients in group B received a single PCIA administration, and 34 patients in group C did not take PCIA analgesia. The levels of postoperative pain-causing substances (plasma substance P, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)), the number of bladder cramps at 48 hours, the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared among different groups of patients. Results: VAS scores, 48h bladder spasms and total duration of patients in groups A and B were significantly lower than those of group C. There were statistically significant differences in VAS scores, 48h bladder spasms and total duration between the three groups, P<0.05; The levels of substance P and 5-HT in groups A and B were significantly lower than those in group C. The differences in the levels of substance P and 5-HT in the three groups were statistically significant, P<0.05; Group A (35.56%), B (32.43) %) and C (20.59%) had no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between patients, P>0.05. Conclusion: Both continuous pump injection and single administration of oxycodone PCIA can achieve analgesia and relieve bladder spasm after TURP, and there is no serious adverse reaction, which is worthy of clinical reference.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 曾汉云.良性前列腺增生行经尿道电切术治疗患者的临床护理路径[J].实用临床医药杂志,2019,23(13):123~125,128. [2] Johnston M J,Guillaumier S,Jaafari F A,et al.The 'urological stethoscope':an essential aide for the modern benign prostatic hyperplasia specialist?[J].BJU International,2020,125(5):632~633. [3] 梁芸,高静,柏丁兮,等.经尿道前列腺切除术后尿路感染危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国感染控制杂志,2021,20(6):537~543. [4] 樊肖冲,徐富兴,邢飞,等.经皮穿刺微球囊压迫术治疗手术后复发性三叉神经痛及其负性情绪的疗效分析[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2021,56(1):77~80. [5] 范成龙,吴勇,周鑫,等.PCIA联合TPVB或ESPB对肺癌开胸手术镇痛效果血流动力学及血清炎性因子影响[J].河北医学,2021,27(4):567~571. [6] 余红春,江婷婷.不同剂量羟考酮应用于经腹子宫肌瘤剔除术的镇痛效果及对病人应激反应的影响[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2021,46(2):194~197. [7] 邓红波,封享兰,张宗泽,等.舒芬太尼或羟考酮自控静脉镇痛联合腰方肌阻滞用于剖宫产术后镇痛的效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(2):124~127. |
|
|
|