|
|
|
| Effect of Intramuscular Binding Combined with Isokinetic Muscle Strength Training on Shoulder Joint and iEMG in Patients with Rotator Cuff Injury |
| LU Boxun, et al |
| Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing 100038, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the effect of intramuscular binding combined with isokinetic muscle strength training on shoulder joint and integrated electromyography (iEMG) in patients with rotator cuff injury. Methods: 119 patients with rotator cuff injury in our hospital from October 2020 to April 2021 were randomly divided into control group (n = 59) and observation group (n = 60). The control group received routine rehabilitation training, and the observation group received isokinetic muscle strength training + intramuscular binding technology based on the control group for 4 consecutive courses of intervention. The degree of pain [visual analogue scale (VAS)], shoulder function [University of California shoulder scoring system (UCLA)], shoulder range of motion (flexion, internal rotation, external rotation and extension), rotator cuff muscle iEMG, degree of muscle atrophy and quality of life [concise health status scale (SF-36)] before and after intervention were counted. Results: The VAS scores (3.05 ± 0.61, 1.73 ± 0.53) in the observation group after 2 courses of intervention and 4 courses of treatment were lower than those in the control group (3.38 ± 0.65, 2.02 ± 0.62), the difference was statistically significant (T1 = 2.856, T2 = 2.744, P<0.05). After 4 courses of intervention, the UCLA score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). After 4 courses of intervention, the activities of external rotation, internal rotation, flexion and extension of shoulder joint in the observation group (72.26 ± 5.08, 55.31 ± 4.44, 170.43 ± 13.38, 54.33 ± 4.12) ° were greater than those in the control group (57.73 ± 5.29, 46.62 ± 5.13, 145.56 ± 17.73, 36.61 ± 4.59) ° with significant difference (T1 = 15.284, T2 = 9.886, T3 = 8.646, T4 = 22.170, P<0.05). The VAS scores (3.05 ± 0.61, 1.73 ± 0.53) in the observation group after 2 courses of intervention and 4 courses of treatment were lower than those in the control group (3.38 ± 0.65, 2.02 ± 0.62), the difference was statistically significant (T1 = 2.856, T2 = 2.744, P<0.05). After 4 courses of intervention, the UCLA score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). After 4 courses of intervention, the activities of external rotation, internal rotation, flexion and extension of shoulder joint in the observation group (72.26 ± 5.08, 55.31 ± 4.44, 170.43 ± 13.38, 54.33 ± 4.12) ° were greater than those in the control group (57.73 ± 5.29, 46.62 ± 5.13, 145.56 ± 17.73, 36.61 ± 4.59) ° with significant difference (T1 = 15.284, T2 = 9.886, T3 = 8.646, T4 = 22.170, P<0.05). Conclusion: The application of intramuscular binding technique combined with isokinetic muscle strength training in patients with rotator cuff injury can reduce pain, improve muscle strength, expand shoulder joint range of motion and restore shoulder joint function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘中阳,王文波.富血小板血浆治疗肩袖损伤的研究进展[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2019,41(2):221~224.
[2] Oh JH,Park MS,Rhee SM,et al.Treatment strategy for irreparable rotator cuff tears[J].Clin Orthop Surg,2018,10(2):119~134.
[3] 马帅统,冯晓东,李瑞青,等.温针灸结合肌内效贴扎技术治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征临床观察[J].光明中医,2020,35(2):231~233.
[4] 段青松.肌内效贴扎技术对脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛的疗效分析[J].中国疗养医学,2020,29(1):33~34.
[5] 陈孝平,汪建平.外科学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.647~648.
[6] 王冬梅,修文明,孙雅宁,等.乳痈汤联合针灸对乳痈患者视觉模拟评分法评分、数字分级法评分和生命质量评价量表-36评分的影响[J].世界中医药,2019,14(4):1016~1019.
[7] 李光政,李苏皖,谢洋,等.关节镜下关节囊松解术治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎[J].皖南医学院学报,2019,38(2):143~145.
[8] 林荣.温针灸配合康复训练治疗中激惹度肩袖损伤的临床观察[D].福建中医药大学,2020.
[9] Yorukoglu AC,Savkin R,Buer N,et al.Is there a relation between rotator cuff injury and core stability[J].Back Musculoskelet Rehabil,2019,32(3):445~452.
[10] 范利,杨坚,张颖,等.等速肌力训练对偏瘫患者上肢运动功能恢复的影响[J].中国康复,2017,32(1):10~12.
[11] 王巍,张锦明.肌内效贴扎应用于肩袖损伤康复治疗的效果观察[J].解放军医学院学报,2019,40(8):776~779,785. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 27 
