|
|
|
| Effects of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Laparoscopic Surgery on Resection Rate and Complications of Gastric Lamina Propria Stromal Tumor |
| HUANG Kehua, YUAN Shengchun, ZHANG Zhen |
| Liaoyang Central Hospital, Liaoning Liaoyang 111000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the effects of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESE) and laparoscopic surgery on resection rate and complications of gastric lamina propria stromal tumor. Methods: The clinical data of 186 patients with gastric muscularis propria stromal tumor were retrospectively analyzed. 62 patients in the laparoscopic group were treated with laparoscopic surgery, 61 patients in the EFR group were treated with endoscopic full-thickness resection, and 63 patients in the ESE group were treated with endoscopic submucosal excavation treatment, and the study compared the operation time of the three groups, the average body temperature of 3 days after the operation, the total number of white blood cells on the day after the operation, the postoperative ventilation time, the hospitalization cost, the hospitalization time, the incidence of complications, and the resection rate. Results: There was no significant difference in operation time, total white blood cell count, average temperature of 3 days after operation, resection rate and complications among the three groups (P>0.05). The postoperative ventilation time and hospitalization time of EFR group and ESE group were shorter than those of laparoscopic group, and the hospitalization cost was less than that of laparoscopic group (P<0.05). The hospitalization cost of EFR group was shorter than that of ESE group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery, ESE, EFR surgery can completely resect the lesion tissue of patients with gastric muscularis propria stromal tumor, but compared with laparoscopic surgery, endoscopic surgery has shorter hospitalization time and lower hospitalization cost, but endoscopic surgery is more complicated than laparoscopic surgery, so it is still necessary to choose reasonable surgical methods according to the actual situation of patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 赵春临,李鹏辉,叶延伟,等.胃肠间质瘤95例临床病理特点及预后分析[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2017,6(52):115~117.
[2] 郑晓娟,王贵齐,刘勇,等.内镜经黏膜下隧道肿瘤切除术治疗食管胃结合部固有肌层来源的黏膜下肿瘤[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2019,41(2):129~134.
[3] Huberty V,Verset L,Deviere J.Endoscopic full-thickness resection of a gastric GI stromal tumor[J].Videogie,2019,4(3):120~122.
[4] 陈佳园,黄智铭.内镜下肿瘤挖除术治疗固有肌层来源胃肿瘤的临床分析[J].浙江医学,2018,40(3):269~272,290.
[5] Mahajan N N,Nagpal S J S,Song L M W K,et al.Laparoendoscopic transgastric resection of prepyloric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (PMID:30848716)[J].Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery,2019,14(1):66~68.
[6] Wang C Y,Ser K H,Kuan W S,et al.Surgical intervention of a giant gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor following neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib[J].Formosan Journal of Surgery,2018,51(4):162~166.
[7] 中国胃肠道间质瘤病理共识意见专家组.中国胃肠道间质瘤诊断治疗专家共识(2017年版)病理解读[J].中华病理学杂志,2018,47(1):2~6.
[8] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会外科学组,中国医师协会内镜医师分会消化内镜专业委员会,中华医学会外科学分会胃肠外科学组.中国消化道黏膜下肿瘤内镜诊治专家共识(2018版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(8):841~852.
[9] 寸红丽,李振辉,王关顺.胃肠道间质瘤靶向治疗疗效评价的影像学进展[J].医学影像学杂志,2018,28(9):165~167.
[10] Wu Haiyan,Wang Aikun.Effect of laparoscopic surgery on quality of life and body's immune function in patients with gastric stromal tumor[J].Minimally invasive medicine,2018,13(6):732~734.
[11] 卫星,张佳,石婷娟.消化内镜下切除术与腹腔镜手术治疗<3.5cm胃间质瘤的临床效果比较[J].中国基层医药,2020,27(16):1943~1946.
[12] 魏明,王园园,张兴,等.胃肠外科腹腔镜切口感染病原菌及感染原因分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2020,41(2):142~144,153.
[13] 赵向东.腹腔镜联合内镜手术治疗胃间质瘤患者的疗效及预后[J].实用临床医学,2018,19(6):36~37,47. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 27 
