|
|
|
| Analysis of the Analgesic Effect of Intermittent Epidural Administration on Primipara and its Influence on NSE S100 β and a β |
| LIU Yumei, WANG Zhanhui, ZHANG Xiuxin, et al |
| Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao, Shandong Qingdao 266300, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To study the effect of intermittent epidural administration on labor analgesia and the effects of neuron specific enolase (NSE), S100β protein (S100β) and amyloid β protein (Aβ) in primipara. Methods: 86 primiparas received labor analgesia from January 2018 to March 2019 in our hospital were selected into the study object. They were divided into observation group and control group by simple random grouping method, 43 cases in each group. Two groups of patients were given epidural labor analgesia, the observation group of epidural regular intermittent administration, the control group of epidural continuous administration. The changes of vas, NSE, S100 β and a β levels before and after analgesia were compared between the two groups. In addition, the delivery mode and adverse reactions during analgesia were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at different time points before and after analgesia (P>0.05).The VAS score of the two groups at different time points after analgesia was significantly lower than that before analgesia (P<0.05).The natural delivery rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the rates of vaginal midwifery and cesarean section were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in NSE, S100β and Aβ levels between the two groups before and after analgesia (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (9.30% vs 16.28%) during analgesia (P>0.05). Conclusion: Both regular intermittent epidural administration and continuous epidural administration can be used for labor analgesia of primipara with satisfactory analgesic effect and low incidence of adverse drug reactions. They can maintain the balance of NSE, S100β and Aβ. In contrast, regular intermittent epidural administration has the advantage of high natural delivery rate and has high clinical application value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李彩兰.分娩镇痛对胎儿及新生儿的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2014,43(19):2316~2317.
[2] Seval M M, Yuce T, Kalafat E, et al. Comparison of effects of digital vaginal examination with transperineal ultrasound during labor on pain and anxiety levels: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016,48(6):695~700.
[3] Kuczkowski K M. Ambulatory labor analgesia: what does an obstetrician need to know[J]. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2015, 83(5):415~424.
[4] 徐燕,曹迎九.分娩球配合自由体位助产对产妇产程及剖宫产率的影响[J].中国临床研究,2016,29(4):546~548.
[5] Komatsu R, Carvalho B, Flood P. Prediction of outliers in pain, analgesia requirement, and recovery of function after childbirth: a prospective observational cohort study[J]. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2018, 121(2):417~426.
[6] Lorenzini C, Moreira L B, Ferreira M B. Efficacy of ropivacaine compared with ropivacaine plus sufentanil for postoperative analgesia after major knee surgery.[J]. Anaesthesia, 2015, 57(5):424~428.
[7] Amer Whlin I, Christoffersson M, Dahlgren N, et al. Epidural analgesia with sufentanil during labor and operative delivery[J]. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2015, 79(7):538~542.
[8] 张建波,刘东洋,王晓俏,等.规律间断与持续硬膜外注射对分娩镇痛产妇运动功能及分娩结果的影响比较[J].广东医学,2017,38(3):425~427.
[9] 赵晓亮,陈晓芳,徐桂萍.罗哌卡因规律间断硬膜外分娩镇痛对分娩结局的影响[J].中国医师杂志,2017,19(11):1704~1706.
[10] 沈启云.不同麻醉方式对妊娠期高血压疾病剖宫产患者认知功能的影响[J].医学临床研究,2017,34(4):817~819.
[11] 郑磊,吴利君.罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼或芬太尼腰硬联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛的比较[J].安徽医药,2016,20(3):576~577. |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 26 
