|
|
Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Gaba Martin Add treatment in the Treatment of Refractory Partial Epilepsy Patients |
SHAO Guangtian, et al |
The People's Hospital of Pingdu, Shandong Pingdu 266700, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety analysis of Gaba Martin Add treatment in the treatment of Refractory partial epilepsy patients. Method: 70 Refractory partial epilepsy patients admitted to neurology department of our hospital were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the experiment group with 35 cases in each group. The control group was given a Carbamazepine Tablets starting dose of 5mg/kg daily, gradually increased to 20 mg/kg. Topiramate Tablets starting dose of 0.8mg/kg per day could be gradually increased to 7mg/kg. The patients in the experimental group were added gabapentin Capsule on the basis of the control group. First gabapentin capsules 300mg orally every time, 1 times a day, second doses of gabapentin capsules 300mg orally every day, 2 times a day, third days until the end of treatment for gabapentin capsules 300mg oral every time, 3 times a day. Two groups of patients were treated for a period of 6 months. After treatment, the clinical efficacy, memory function, the degree of neurological deficit, T lymphocyte group, serum immunoglobulin and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results: After treatment, 2 weeks after the onset of the attack frequency and the frequency of attack after 12 weeks was lower than the baseline frequency. Compared with before treatment, after treatment, the 2 groups of CMS score increased, NFDS score decreased, IgA, IgG and IgM levels decreased, serum CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/ CD8+ increased(P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the total effective rate of treatment group was higher after 4 weeks, 12 weeks after the onset of lower frequency, higher CMS scores, lower NFDS score, IgA, IgG and IgM low level of serum CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/, CD8+ high and low incidence rate of adverse reaction, the difference has statistical significance(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups before and after treatment with CD8+(P>0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy is significant. It can improve the memory function, nerve function and immune function of patients.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 林志刚,冯建华,潘慧.左乙拉西坦添加治疗儿童部分性或全面性癫痫19例临床分析[J].中国基层医药,2014,21(4):608~609.
[2] 王文志,吴建中,王德生,等.中国五省农村人群癫痫流行病学抽样调查[J].中华医学杂志,2002,82(7):449~452.
[3] 黄颖,杜华斌,杨申,等.宁夏青铜峡地区人群癫痫流行病学及药物治疗的调查研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2008,37(8):1068~1070.
[4] 王欣,薛朝霞.加巴喷丁的药理学及其在疼痛临床的应用进展[J].实用疼痛学杂志,2010,06(2):129~133.
[5] 杨牧,周红,陈超.基于分子靶点分析抗癫痫中药作用机制的研究[J].中药药理与临床,2006,22(5):63~64.
[6] 吴逊,李文慧.国际抗癫痫联盟和名词委员会推荐的癫痫发作的临床及脑电图分类[J].中华神经科杂志,2001,34(3):187~188.
[7] 吴立文,邓施平,彭炳蔚.癫痫及癫痫综合征国际分类(1989年)的临床应用分析[J].中华神经科杂志,2005,38(6):370~372.
[8] 李世绰,吴立文.临床诊疗指南:癫痫病分册[M].人民卫生出版社,2007.47~35.
[9] 刘之红,刘之英.35例癫痫患者的康复指导[J].中国实用医药,2012,7(7):237~238.
[10] 继成.世界抗癫痫药物研究开发最新进展[J].中国制药信息,2007,23(6):8~11.
[11] 田元元,黄希顺,陈晨,等.左乙拉西坦治疗部分性发作癫痫持续状态2例报告并文献复习[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2014,9(3):265~266.
[12] 聂光军,初凤娜,崔俐,等.拉莫三嗪对癫痫患者认知功能影响的研究[J].中风与神经疾病,2012,29(10):930~931.
[13] 陈宝泉,刘肖英,李彩文.新型抗癫痫药加巴喷丁[J].中国新药杂志,2007,16(11):900~902.
[14] 臧颖卓,王维平,刘瑞春,等.加巴喷丁对癫痫大鼠海马神经元及P75NTR表达的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2016,45(17):2000~2002.
[15] 冯艺,崔明磊,William D.WILLIS.抗惊厥药加巴喷丁抑制内脏疼痛的作用及其与脊髓氨基酸递质释放的关系[J].北京大学学报医学版,2003,35(3):307~310.
[16] 邹功胜,胡兴国,孔明,等.鞘内注射加巴喷丁和/或吗啡对切口痛大鼠脊髓氨基酸含量的影响[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2009,30(4):332~334.
[17] 谢娜,邓建中,申长发,等.加巴喷丁胶囊单药治疗癫痫感觉性部分发作的临床研究[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(7):187~188. |
|
|
|