2025年4月4日 星期五
首页        期刊介绍        编委会        投稿指南        期刊订阅        广告合作        联系我们        English
河北医学  2019, Vol. 25 Issue (7): 1214-1216    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2019.07.042
  临床研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
自制穿刺器在胸腔镜手术中与传统开胸手术效果及安全性对比
杨斌, 郑玄, 孙静, 李澄, 王静, 王晓强, 丁梅, 陈铁良
河北省唐山市协和医院胸外科, 河北 唐山 063004
Comparative Analysis of the Application of Self-made Puncture Apparatus in Thoracoscopic Surgery and Traditional Thoracotomy
YANG Bin, ZHENG Xuan, SUN Jing, et al
Tangshan Union Hospital, Hebei Tangshan 063004, China
全文: PDF (1243 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的: 研究自制穿刺器在胸腔镜手术中的应用与传统开胸手术临床中的对比分析。方法: 选取2012年5月至2015年12月我院住院治疗的自发性气胸患者88例作为研究对象,按照手术方式的不同分为观察组44例,对照组44例;观察组采用胸腔镜手术应用自制穿刺器,对照组采用传统开胸手术;对比两组患者术中与术后各指标情况,并发症情况、术后对患者进行随访观察术后复发情况。结果: 观察组患者的术中出血量为(61.81±9.31)mL,显著低于对照组[(90.23±15.83)mL,P<0.05];手术时间为(71.1±12.89)min,显著低于对照组[(83.95±13.76)min,P<0.05];术后下床时间为(23.16±7.32)h,显著低于对照组[(46.97±10.72)h,P<0.05];住院时间为(6.82±1.22)d,显著低于对照组[(9.54±2.81)d,P<0.05]。两组患者治疗期间并发症发生情况,观察组并发症总发生率显著低于对照组,组间差异具有统计学意义(χ2=5.091,P<0.05);根据随访结果对照组复发患者显著高于观察组,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=3.106,P<0.05)。结论: 自制穿刺器在胸腔镜中手术中的使用较为安全,与传统开胸手术对比操作简单,手术创伤小患者术后无严重并发症,并且明显减轻患者的经济负担。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 自制穿刺器胸腔镜手术开胸手术自发性气胸    
AbstractObjective: To study the application of self-made puncture device in thoracoscopic surgery and traditional thoracotomy. Methods: 88 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax who were hospitalized in our hospital from May 2012 to December 2015were divided into observation group (n = 44) and control group (n = 44). The patients in the control group were treated with traditional thoracotomy, the indexes and complications were compared between the two groups, and the patients were followed up to observe the recurrence after operation. Results: The volume of bleeding in the observation group was (61.81+9.31) mL, significantly lower than that in the control group [(90.23+15.83) mL, P<0.05]; the operation time was (71.1+12.89) min, significantly lower than that in the control group [(83.95+13.76) min, P<0.05]; the time of getting out of bed after operation was (23.16+7.32) h, significantly higher than that in the control group [(46.97+10.72) h, P<0.05]; The time was (6.82 + 1.22) days, which was significantly lower than that of the control group [(9.54 + 2.81) days, P<0.05]. The total incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2= 5.091, P<0.05); according to the follow-up results, the recurrence rate in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group (χ2= 3.106, P<0.05). Conclusion: The self-made puncture device is safe to be used in thoracoscopic surgery. Compared with traditional thoracotomy, it is simple to operate, and there are no serious complications in patients with minor surgical trauma,and significantly reduce the financial burden of the patient.
Key wordsSelf-made puncture device    Thoracoscopic surgery    Thoracotomy    Spontaneous pneumothorax
    
基金资助:河北省唐山市科技计划项目,(编号:17130246a)
引用本文:   
杨斌, 郑玄, 孙静, 李澄, 王静, 王晓强, 丁梅, 陈铁良. 自制穿刺器在胸腔镜手术中与传统开胸手术效果及安全性对比[J]. 河北医学, 2019, 25(7): 1214-1216.
YANG Bin, ZHENG Xuan, SUN Jing, et al. Comparative Analysis of the Application of Self-made Puncture Apparatus in Thoracoscopic Surgery and Traditional Thoracotomy. HeBei Med, 2019, 25(7): 1214-1216.
链接本文:  
http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2019.07.042     或     http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2019/V25/I7/1214
冀ICP备2025106803号    冀公网安备13080202000786号
版权所有 © 2016 《河北医学》杂志社
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发