2025年4月16日 星期三
首页        期刊介绍        编委会        投稿指南        期刊订阅        广告合作        联系我们        English
河北医学  2017, Vol. 23 Issue (1): 63-64    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2017.01.021
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血不同时机开颅手术及血管内治疗的疗效及预后因素分析
曾光, 洪明, 徐岩, 杨巨亮
辽宁省阜新矿业集团总医院神经外科, 辽宁 阜新 123000
Analysis on Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Craniotomy at Different Time and Endovascular Therapy for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Caused by Ruptured Aneurysm
ZENG Guang, HONG Ming, XU Yan, et al
Liaoning Fuxin Mining Group General Hospital Neurosurgery, Liaoning Fuxin 123000, China
全文: PDF (184 KB)   HTML (0 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的: 分析颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)不同时机开颅术及血管内介入治疗的疗效差异以及预后不同。方法: 回顾性分析152例颅内动脉瘤性SAH患者的临床资料,依照Hunt-Hess分级法将所有患者分为两组,低分级(n=87,Ⅰ~Ⅲ级)和高分级(n=65,Ⅳ~Ⅴ级),应用格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)评价患者预后,比较两组患者中早期、延期行开颅术及血管内介入术的效果差异。结果: 低分级中,早期行开颅术及血管内介入术的良好率高于延期治疗差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.05);高分级中,延期行开颅术及血管内介入术的良好率高于早期治疗差异无统计学意义(P均<0.05);低分级和高分级的行开颅术及血管内介入术的良好率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 手术时机是影响颅内动脉瘤性SAH治疗效果的重要因素,而手术方式与治疗效果无相关性,积极行开颅术及血管内介入术能够有效改善患者预后。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
曾光
洪明
徐岩
杨巨亮
关键词 蛛网膜下腔出血颅内动脉瘤开颅术血管内介术手术时机    
AbstractObjective: To analyze the difference for efficacy and prognosis of craniotomy at different time and endovascular therapy for SAH. methods: The clinical data of 152 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by ruptured aneurysm were analyzed retrospectively, and were divided into two groups according to Hunt-Hess classification, the low grade group(n=87, Ⅰ~Ⅲ level)and the high grade group(n=65, Ⅳ~Ⅴlevel). The GOS was applied to evaluate the prognosis of patients. The effect of craniotomy in the early process and endovascular intervention of two groups was compared. Results: In the low grade group, the good rate of craniotomy and endovascular intervention in the early process was higher than that of delayed treatment(P<0.05). In the high grade group, the good rate of craniotomy and endovascular intervention of delayed treatment was higher than that of early treatment(P<0.05). The difference for the good rate of craniotomy and endovascular intervention between low grade and high grade was not evident(P>0.05). Conclusion: Operation time is an important factor influencing treatment effect of subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by ruptured aneurysm, but operation method has no correlation with treatment effect. Taking craniotomy and endovascular intervention actively can effectively improve the prognosis.
Key wordsSubarachnoid hemorrhage    Intracranial aneurysm    Craniotomy    Endovascular intervention    Operation time
    
基金资助:辽宁省2015年自然科学基金计划立项项目,(编号:2015020552)
引用本文:   
曾光, 洪明, 徐岩, 杨巨亮. 颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血不同时机开颅手术及血管内治疗的疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(1): 63-64.
ZENG Guang, HONG Ming, XU Yan, et al. Analysis on Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Craniotomy at Different Time and Endovascular Therapy for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Caused by Ruptured Aneurysm. HeBei Med, 2017, 23(1): 63-64.
链接本文:  
http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2017.01.021     或     http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2017/V23/I1/63
冀ICP备2025106803号    冀公网安备13080202000786号
版权所有 © 2016 《河北医学》杂志社
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发