Abstract：Objective: To observe imaging features of MRI in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury of knee joint, and to analyze their diagnostic value.Methods: This study included 109 patients with knee joint injuries treated at our hospital from March 2020 to December 2023. All patients underwent MRI and arthroscopy, with arthroscopy serving as the "gold standard." Patients were divided into an ACL group and a non-ACL group. The MRI imaging features (direct and indirect signs) of both groups were compared. Kappa consistency analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of each imaging feature for ACL injuries, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated.Results: Arthroscopy revealed 46 cases of ACL injuries, including 32 complete tears, 9 partial tears, and 5 tibial avulsions. There were significant differences between the ACL group and the non-ACL group in three direct signs (ACL discontinuity, abnormal course, and edema and thickening) and ten indirect signs (Blumensaat angle, PCL angle, PCL index, bone contusion, notch sign, anterior tibial displacement, uncovered posterior horn of the meniscus, empty intercondylar notch sign, single-layer display of the lateral collateral ligament, and single-layer display of the PCL) (P<0.05). Kappa consistency analysis showed that among the direct signs, the abnormal course had the highest Kappa consistency (Kappa=0.790, P<0.001), and among the indirect signs, Blumensaat angle had the highest Kappa consistency (Kappa=0.569, P<0.001). Sensitivity was highest for the direct sign of abnormal course, while specificity was highest for the indirect sign of empty intercondylar notch sign (P<0.05).Conclusion: MRI imaging features of ACL injuries are distinct, with primary signs being edema and thickening, and abnormal course. The indirect sign of Blumensaat angle can serve as a primary diagnostic basis, while the indirect signs of empty intercondylar notch sign, notch sign, and single-layer display of the PCL can serve as key auxiliary indicators.
代承忠, 王浩东. 膝关节交叉韧带损伤患者MRI影像特点及诊断价值分析[J]. 河北医学, 2024, 30(8): 1358-1362.
DAI Chengzhong, WANG Haodong. MRI Imaging Features and Diagnostic Value in Patients with Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee. HeBei Med, 2024, 30(8): 1358-1362.
[1] Wang DY,Liu SG,Ding J,et al.A deep learning model enhances clinicians' diagnostic accuracy to more than 96% for anterior cruciate ligament ruptures on magnetic resonance imaging[J].Arthroscopy,2024,40(4):1197-1205. [2] 王忠,文明,刘成渝,等.高分辨率CT诊断膝关节半月板及交叉韧带损伤的价值观察[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2022,20(12):153-155. [3] Lukas S,Putman S,Delay C,et al.Knee ligament sprains:diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament injuries by patient interview.Development and evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament injury score (ACLIS)[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2022,108(3):103257. [4] 黄炳罡.关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术治疗膝前交叉韧带损伤的临床效果观察[J].中国伤残医学,2022,30(5):33-34. [5] Altahawi F,Owens A,Caruso CH,et al.Development and operationalization of an automated workflow for correlation of knee MRI and arthroscopy findings[J].Am Coll Radiol,2024,21(4):609-616. [6] Helito P V P,Helito C P,Rodrigues M B.Anterolateral ligament MRI of the knee in ACL injuries:MRI abnormalities association with instability[J].European radiology,2023,33(2):1456-1464. [7] 栾海龙,王宇,刘松波,等.关节镜下前交叉韧带修复术治疗膝关节轻度前向不稳临床疗效[J].临床军医杂志,2021,49(12):1309-1312,1315. [8] 向以四,陆志前,张敏.急性前交叉韧带损伤MRI多征象与关节镜对照研究[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2019,44(4):516-519,522. [9] 李剑,王渭君,孙明辉,等.基于EOS双平面成像分析Blumensaat线的空间倾斜度与前交叉韧带损伤的相关性[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(4):329-335.
2024, Vol. 30 
冀公网安备13080202000677号