气管插管全麻与喉罩全麻用于腹腔镜胆囊切除患者麻醉效果的观察

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.05.07

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (9)

全文: PDF (1195 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的:研究腹腔镜胆囊切除患者使用喉罩全麻和气管插管全麻后的效果及对血流动学的影响分析。方法:选取在我院择期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者60例,随机分为喉罩全麻组和气管插管全麻组,各30例。观察两组患者麻醉诱导前(T0)、诱导后喉罩与气管插管置入前(T1)、喉罩与气管插管置入时(T2)、腹腔镜置入时(T3)、手术进行30min时(T4)、术前改良镇静清醒评分(OAA/S)≥4分时(T5)等时间点的心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、血氧饱和度(SpO₂)、脑电双频谱指数(BIS)、阿曲库铵和异丙酚的使用剂量,同时观察两组患者在拔除喉罩和气管插管时患者的反应和麻醉后的清醒时间。结果:喉罩组麻醉满意度为90.00%,明显高于气管插管组73.33%(χ²=9.815,P<0.05);喉罩组异丙酚和阿曲库铵的使用剂量明显少于气管插管组(t=2.177、4.162,P<0.05);喉罩组患者苏醒时间明显短于气管插管组,且体动呛咳反应发生率明显低于气管插管组(t/χ²=3.175、6.812,P<0.05);喉罩组T2、T4时间点中SBP、DBP和HR水平明显低于气管插管组(P<0.05),但各时间点两组患者的BIS值经比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术中采用喉罩全麻可有效减少麻醉药物的使用剂量,同时患者血流动学较气管插管全麻患者稳定,且患者术后苏醒快等优点值得临床推广应用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：喉罩全麻, 气管插管全麻, 胆囊切除术, 脑电双频谱指数

Abstract：Objective: To study the effect of general anesthesia with laryngeal mask versus general anesthesia with tracheal intubation in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the influence on hemodynamics. Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into a laryngeal mask general anesthesia group and an tracheal intubation general anesthesia group, 30 cases in each.The heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), electroencephalographic bispectral index (BIS), and the dose of atracurium and isoproterenol were observed at the time points before induction of anesthesia (T0), before laryngeal mask and tracheal intubation placement after induction (T1), at the time of laryngeal mask and tracheal intubation placement (T2), at the time of laparoscopic placement (T3), at 30 min into the operation (T4), and when the preoperative modified sedation and wakefulness score (OAA/S) was ≥4 (T5) in the two groups. The doses of atracurium and isoproterenol were also observed, as well as the patient's response and post-anesthesia wakefulness time during removal of the mask and tracheal intubation in both groups. Results: The satisfaction rate of anesthesia in the laryngeal mask group was 90.00%, which was significantly higher than that in the tracheal intubation group, which was 73.33% (χ²=9.815, P<0.05). The doses of propofol and atracurium in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group (t=2.177, 4.162, P<0.05); the awakening time of the patients in the laryngeal mask group was significantly shorter than that in the tracheal intubation group, and the incidence of somatic choking reaction was significantly lower than that in the tracheal intubation group (t/χ²=3.175, 6.812 , P<0.05); the levels of SBP, DBP and HR in the laryngeal mask group at time points T2 and T4 were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the BIS values between the two groups at each time point (P>0.05). Conclusion: The use of laryngeal mask general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy can effectively reduce the dosage of anesthetic drugs, and the patient's blood flow is more stable than that of tracheal intubation patients under general anesthesia, and the patients wake up quickly after surgery. It is worthy of clinical application.

Key words： General anesthesia with laryngeal mask General anesthesia with tracheal intubation Cholecystectomy EEG bispectral index

基金资助:国家自然科学基金,(编号:81760540)

引用本文:

伍兰, 田彬, 易勤美. 气管插管全麻与喉罩全麻用于腹腔镜胆囊切除患者麻醉效果的观察[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(5): 736-739.
WU Lan, et al. The Effect of General Anesthesia with Tracheal Intubation Versus General Anesthesia with Laryngeal Mask in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. HeBei Med, 2022, 28(5): 736-739.

链接本文:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.05.07 或 http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2022/V28/I5/736

[1] Mashin A M.Comparison of hemodynamic and ventilation parameters using various methods of anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Emergency Medicine,2020,16(1):78~84.
[2] Luong N V, Giang N T, Chuong H V,et al.Evaluation of efficacy of free opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a prospective,randomized double-blinded study[J].The Open Anesthesiology Journal,2020,14(1):73~79.
[3] 陈亚莉,邵建强,刘吉兰.喉罩麻醉与气管内插管麻醉对老年腹腔镜胆囊手术患者呼吸及循环功能的影响[J].贵州医药,2019,43(5):63~65.
[4] 夏勇,宋健,吴浩.达克罗宁对全身麻醉诱导气管插管期间应激反应及术后咽喉疼痛的影响[J].中国药业,2019,28(6):42~44.
[5] 夏贵山.喉罩通气全身麻醉对胆结石患者应激反应及术后自主呼吸恢复时间的影响分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2020,31(19):2.
[6] 方广,张翠红.腹横筋膜阻滞联合右美丙泊酚喉罩全麻腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用效果分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2018,39(1):73~74.
[7] Song Y S, Zhang Y, Xian-Wen H U.Application of sufentanil combined with sevoflurane or propofol in anesthesia induction[J].The Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology,2011,27(6):552~554.
[8] 李小静,陈文佳,朱雅斌,等.两种剂量右美托咪定对老年患者全麻气管插管应激反应、血流动力学及不良反应的影响[J].泰州职业技术学院学报,2019,19(2):55~57.
[9] Wei X, Yao X.The impact of intraperitoneal levobupivacaine on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled Studies[J].Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques,2020,30(1):1~6.
[10] 高峰,陈翀,施剑超,等.不同麻醉药物对老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术围术期血流动力学及炎症因子变化的影响[J].现代实用医学,2016,28(11):1467~1468.
[11] 郭丽英,陆文英,章国芬,等.不同麻醉方式对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后免疫及应激状况的影响分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2018,23(1):156~157.
[12] Ece R H D, Sarita S.The effects of music on the life signs of patients in the reanimation unit/recovery room after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Holistic Nursing Practice,2019,33(5):295~302.
[13] 白晓刚,侯改娟,王俊.喉罩通气全麻与气管插管全麻在临床麻醉中的比较[J].中国保健营养,2018,28(27):58.