T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折疗效及对围术期指标肘关节功能评分和并发症的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.03.015

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (12)

全文: PDF (1394 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的:探究T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折疗效及对围术期指标、肘关节功能评分和并发症的影响。方法:随机选取我院118例Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折患者为研究对象,按照简单随机法分为观察组和对照组,对照组(n=58)行T型钢板固定术治疗,观察组(n=60)行T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗,比较两组围手术期指标、疼痛评分、术后并发症及肘关节功能。结果:观察组临床有效率为93.33%,对照组为77.59%,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组手术时间、术后开始运动时间均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),两组术中出血量、手术切口长度、治疗费用差异比较无统计学意义(P>0.05);VAS评分组间、时间点、组间×时间点比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后1d、3d、7d VAS评分均依次降低(P<0.05),其中两组术后1d评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后3d、7d VAS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组总并发症率为10.00%,对照组为18.97%,两组差异比较无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后随访6个月,观察组患者肘关节活动范围及Mayo评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折可显著提高临床疗效,缩短术后开始运动时间,降低术后疼痛反应,术后肘关节功能恢复良好,值得推荐。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈舒振
	黄玉良
	张理选

关键词 ： Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折, T形钢板, Herbert螺钉, 术后并发症, 肘关节功能

Abstract：Objective: To explore the efficacy of T-plate combined with Herbert screw internal fixation in the treatment of Mason Ⅲ radial head fractures and its influence on perioperative indicators, elbow function score and complications. Methods: A total of 118 patients with Mason Ⅲ radial head fractures in the hospital were randomly selected as the research subjects, and they were divided into observation group and control group according to the simple random method. The control group (n=58) was treated with T-plate fixation, and the observation group (n=60) was given T-plate combined with Herbert screw internal fixation. Perioperative indicators, pain score, postoperative complications and elbow function were compared between the two groups. Results: The clinical effective rate was 93.33% in observation group and 77.59% in control group, with a statistical difference (P<0.05). The surgical time and postoperative starting exercise time in observation group were significantly shorter or less than those in control group (P<0.05), and there were no statistical differences in intraoperative blood loss, surgical incision length, and treatment cost between the two groups (P>0.05). The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) when comparing VAS scores between groups, time points and between groups x time points. The VAS scores of the two groups were decreased sequentially at 1d, 3d, and 7d after surgery (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the score at 1d after surgery (P>0.05), and the VAS scores at 3d and 7d after surgery were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications was 10.00% in observation group and 18.97% in control group (P>0.05) with no significant statistical difference. At 6 months in follow-up after surgery, the range of motion of elbow joint and Mayo score of observation group were significantly wider or higher than those of control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: T-plate combined with Herbert screw internal fixation in the treatment of Mason Ⅲ radial head fractures can significantly improve the clinical efficacy and postoperative starting exercise time, reduce postoperative pain and restore good postoperative elbow function.

Key words： Mason Ⅲ radial head fractures T-plate Herbert screw Postoperative complications Elbow function

基金资助:广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目,(编号:B2019140)

通讯作者: 黄玉良

引用本文:

陈舒振, 黄玉良, 张理选. T形钢板联合Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折疗效及对围术期指标肘关节功能评分和并发症的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(3): 422-427.
CHEN Shuzhen, HUANG Yuliang, ZHANG Lixuan. Efficacy of T-Plate Combined with Herbert Screw Internal Fixation for Mason Ⅲ Radial Head Fractures and Its Influence on Perioperative Indicators Elbow Function Score and Complications. HeBei Med, 2022, 28(3): 422-427.

链接本文:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.03.015 或 http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2022/V28/I3/422

[1] 叶凯,安智全.桡骨头骨折和桡骨颈骨折的临床治疗进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2020,41(1):42~46.
[2] 梅毅宁,杨秋贤.三种方法治疗成人MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的临床疗效分析[J].中医临床研究,2020,12(33):114~116.
[3] 黄爱民,徐名洪,吕维宝.T型钢板内固定与石膏外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2020,23(1):98~101.
[4] 欧阳阳钢,孙浩然,姜宗圆,等.腕关节镜辅助下双枚Herbert螺钉经皮内固定微创治疗不稳定腕舟骨骨折[J].中华手外科杂志,2021,37(2):142~144.
[5] 东海潮,徐欣,李培楠,等.微型钢板,Herbert螺钉及可吸收棒内固定修复MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(4):32~38.
[6] 高化,刘振宇,白晓冬,等.组配型假体置换与钢板螺钉内固定治疗成人Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折疗效的比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(2):143~148.
[7] 汪勇刚,王敏.三种不同内固定方案治疗成人MasonⅡ型桡骨小头骨折的效果[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(6):62~65,81.
[8] 丰瑞兵,王华松,蔡贤华,等.切开复位2.5 mm微型锁定加压钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端Die-punch骨折的疗效分析[J].华南国防医学杂志,2020,34(6):385~388,396.
[9] 宁凡友,许海燕,赵子龙,等.Herbert钉内固定治疗Mason-Johnston Ⅲ、Ⅳ型桡骨头骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(3):313~314.
[10] 沈强,张立明,舒媛,等.Herbert螺钉内固定加改良植骨术治疗陈旧性腕舟骨骨折的临床研究[J].临床误诊误治,2019,32(7):58~62.
[11] 陈晓琳,老锦雄,谢韶东,等.两种康复锻炼方法促进Sanders Ⅳ型跟骨骨折术后功能恢复的对比研究[J].重庆医学,2019,48(5):145~148.
[12] 蔡英富,崔顺平,秦立亭.双头加压螺钉及微型锁定接骨板在桡骨小头骨折内固定中的应用[J].海南医学,2019,30(19):65~68.