2025年4月5日 星期六
首页        期刊介绍        编委会        投稿指南        期刊订阅        广告合作        联系我们        English
河北医学  2021, Vol. 27 Issue (4): 575-579    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2021.04.011
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
高位头颈开窗植骨术与异体腓骨支撑术治疗早期股骨头坏死的疗效对比研究
王兆贺1,2, 韦标方2, 杜希望2
1.山东第一医科大学/山东省医学科学院, 山东 泰安 271000
2.山东省临沂市人民医院股骨头专科, 山东 临沂 276000
Comparative Study on the Effect of the Bone Grafting through Fenestration at High Level and Allogeneic Fibula Support in the Treatment of Early Femoral Head Necrosis
WANG Zhaohe, et al
Shandong First Medical University / Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Taian 271000, China
全文: PDF (1860 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的: 比较高位头颈开窗病灶清除植骨术与髓芯减压、同种异体腓骨支撑术治疗ARCOⅡ期股骨头坏死的疗效。方法: 回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年6月期间就诊于本院的60例(68髋)股骨头坏死患者。其中,24例(26髋)行高位头颈开窗病灶清除植骨术治疗(A组),36例(42髋)行髓芯减压、同种异体腓骨支撑术治疗(B组)。术后采用Harris评分及VAS评分进行临床效果评价,通过复查X线片可以察看股骨头的形态变化,对患者保髋临床效果进行评价。结果: 两组患者均获随访,A组患者随访12~40个月,平均(26.2±1.7)个月;B组患者随访12~38个月,平均(25.4±1.2)个月。A组患者中有4例保髋失败,保髋成功率为84.6%;B组12髋保髋失败,保髋成功率为71.4%。末次随访两组保髋成功患者时,Harris评分:A组(93.23±2.19)分,B组(85.46±2.32)分,两组评分均高于术前,差异有统计学意义(t=27.652,P<0.05;t=25.527,P<0.05);VAS评分:A组(1.21±0.54)分,B组(2.43±0.60)分,两组评分均低于术前,差异有统计学意义(t=16.743,P<0.05;t=17.514,P<0.05);组间各评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: 对于早期股骨头坏死的治疗,高位头颈开窗病灶清除植骨术的临床疗效优于髓芯减压、同种异体腓骨支撑术,能够改善髋关节症状。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 股骨头坏死高位头颈开窗腓骨支撑术    
AbstractObjective: To compare the curative effect of debridement of high head and neck fenestration and bone grafting with core decompression and allograft fibula support in the treatment of ARCO stage II femoral head necrosis.Methods: 60 patients (68 hips) with osteonecrosis of femoral head in our hospital from January 2015 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 24 cases (26 hips) were treated with high head and neck fenestration, debridement and bone grafting (group A), 36 cases (42 hips) were treated with core decompression and allograft fibula support (group B). Harris score and VAS score were used to evaluate the clinical effect after operation. The morphological changes of the femoral head could be observed by reexamination of X-ray film, and the clinical effect of hip preservation was evaluated. Results: Patients in both groups were followed up. Patients in group A were followed up for 12~40 months with an average of (26.2±1.7) months; patients in group B were followed up for 12 to 38 months with an average of (25.4±1.2) months. In group A, 4 patients failed to preserve hips, and the success rate of hip preservation was 84.6%; in group B, 12 hips failed to preserve hips, and the success rate of hip preservation was 71.4%. At the last follow-up of the two groups of patients with successful hip preservation, Harris score: group A (93.23±2.19) points, group B (85.46±2.32) points, the scores of the two groups were higher than those before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (t=27.652, P<0.05; t=25.527, P<0.05); VAS score: group A (1.21±0.54) points, group B (2.43±0.60) points, the scores of the two groups were lower than those before surgery, the difference was statistically significant (t =16.743, P<0.05; t=17.514, P<0.05); the difference in scores between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: For the treatment of early avascular necrosis of the femoral head, the clinical effect of high head and neck fenestration debridement and bone grafting is better than core decompression and allograft fibula support, which can improve the symptoms of hip joint.
Key wordsOsteonecrosis of the femoral head    Fenestration at high level    Fibula support
    
基金资助:山东省科学技术发展计划项目,(编号:2014GSF119022);山东省临沂市人民医院研究生培养计划,(编号:YJS2020030)
通讯作者: 韦标方   
引用本文:   
王兆贺, 韦标方, 杜希望. 高位头颈开窗植骨术与异体腓骨支撑术治疗早期股骨头坏死的疗效对比研究[J]. 河北医学, 2021, 27(4): 575-579.
WANG Zhaohe, et al. Comparative Study on the Effect of the Bone Grafting through Fenestration at High Level and Allogeneic Fibula Support in the Treatment of Early Femoral Head Necrosis. HeBei Med, 2021, 27(4): 575-579.
链接本文:  
http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2021.04.011     或     http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2021/V27/I4/575
冀ICP备2025106803号    冀公网安备13080202000786号
版权所有 © 2016 《河北医学》杂志社
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发