Clinical Study of Simple Four-point Traction Method and Purse-string Suture Traction Method in the treatment of Severe Rickets with Anastomotic Sacral Hemorrhoids
LI Guoli, ZHANG Suyun
The Hospital of Chifeng, Neimenggu Chifeng 024000, China
Abstract：Objective: To explore the clinical effect of simple four-point traction method and purse-string suture traction method on the treatment of severe rickets with anastomotic sacral hemorrhoidectomy (PPH). Methods: 60 patients with severe rickets admitted to our hospital from March 2018 to May 2019 were enrolled. The patients were divided into study group and control group according to the simple randomization. The study group adopted a simple four-point traction method. The control group was subjected to a purse-string suture traction method. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of pain in patients. Defecation incontinence scale (FISI) and defecation obstruction (ODS) scores were used to estimate the degree of defecation incontinence and obstruction. The VAS scores and surgical related indexes were compared between the two groups. FISI score, ODS score, clinical efficacy, postoperative complications. Results: The VAS score of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group. The intraoperative blood loss of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The operation time and postoperative hospital stay of the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The FISI score and ODS score of the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation (P<0.05). The FISI score and ODS score of the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The total effective rate of the study group was 96.7%, which was higher than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The postoperative complication rate of the study group was 6.7%, which was lower than that of the control group (20.0%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: PPH treatment of severe rickets using simple four-point traction method is more effective than the purse-string suture traction method in reducing pain, defecation incontinence, obstruction, and reducing postoperative complications. It is worth promoting.
李国利, 张素云. 单纯四点牵引法和荷包缝合牵引法对吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗重度痔病的临床研究[J]. 河北医学, 2020, 26(4): 686-689.
LI Guoli, ZHANG Suyun. Clinical Study of Simple Four-point Traction Method and Purse-string Suture Traction Method in the treatment of Severe Rickets with Anastomotic Sacral Hemorrhoids. HeBei Med, 2020, 26(4): 686-689.
[1] 马琳.伞状缝合技术在吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术治疗重度混合痔的临床效果研究[J].中国临床医生杂志,2016,44(3):76~79. [2] 沈伟,鞠玉林,胡占岭.RPH联合改良外切内扎术治疗老年混合痔的效果及患者应激情况观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(6):759~763. [3] 孙留生,凌艳霞,李爱云.改良吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与传统手术治疗中重度痔疮的疗效比较[J].首都食品与医药,2019,26(10):30. [4] 王奎海,崔伟,赵晓光,等.吻合器痔上黏膜环切手术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ期环状混合痔的临床研究[J].解放军医药杂志,2016,28(S1):27~28. [5] 孔维民,王吉侯.选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合术与痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗环状混合痔的临床比较[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(1):74~75. [6] 吴盟.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术和外剥内扎术治疗重度痔疮临床差异分析[J].实用医技杂志,2018,25(6):645~646. [7] Fernandes V, Fonseca J.Polidocanol foam injected at high doses with intravenous needle: the (almost) perfect treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids[J].GE Port Gastroenterol,2019,26(3):169~175. [8] Liu X, Zhang P, Guo C, et al.Effect of rehabilitation therapy and nursing intervention on postoperative recovery of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Exp Ther Med,2019,17(6):4598~4604.
2020, Vol. 26 
冀公网安备13080202000677号