Comparison of Risk of Hypotension between Cesarean Section in Pregnant Women with Severe Preeclampsia and Healthy Pregnant Women under Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia
SHI Jingjing, DONG He
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong Qingdao 266000, China
Abstract：Objective: To investigate the risk of hypotension in cesarean section of pregnant women with severe preeclampsia and healthy pregnant women under combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Methods: 40 pregnant women with severe preeclampsia were enrolled from August 2016 to August 2017 as pregnant women with severe preeclampsia and 240 healthy pregnant women were enrolled as healthy maternal groups. The maternal anesthesia period was compared between the two groups , Neonatal weight, hypotension incidence, anesthesia SBP, DBP, MAP, HR and other adverse reactions. Results: The dosage of lidocaine, the total amount of infusion, the dose of ephedrine and the weight of neonatal were lower than those of healthy pregnant women, and the incidence of hypotension was significantly higher than that of healthy pregnant women group. SBP, DBP and MAP The baseline values, the lowest values after anesthesia, the lowest blood pressure drop and the basal value - the lowest blood pressure values were significantly higher than those in the healthy pregnant women group; HR basal value, lowest postnesthesia, lowest heart rate decline, basal value - lowest heart rate (P <0.01). The significant difference between the two groups was higher than that of the healthy pregnant women group, and the highest heart rate was higher than that of the healthy pregnant women group (P <0.01). The postoperative pain rate was significantly higher than that of healthy pregnant women group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Pregnant women with severe preeclampsia have a higher risk of developing low blood pressure during cesarean section under combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the anesthetic dose and strengthen the management of intraoperative infusion.
石晶晶, 董河. 重度子痫前期孕妇与健康孕妇在腰硬联合麻醉下行剖宫产术发生低血压的风险比较[J]. 河北医学, 2018, 24(1): 16-20.
SHI Jingjing, DONG He. Comparison of Risk of Hypotension between Cesarean Section in Pregnant Women with Severe Preeclampsia and Healthy Pregnant Women under Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia. HeBei Med, 2018, 24(1): 16-20.
[1] 张秀海,尔丽绵.腰硬联合麻醉在重度子痫前期孕妇行剖宫产术的安全应用分析[J].中国临床医生,2015,44(9):69~71. [2] 张素晶,卢国林,陈小琳.罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉在重度子痫前期剖宫产术中的应用[J].福建医药杂志,2012,34(4):99~100. [3] 肖飞,夏丰,常向阳,等.血压正常产妇和子痫前期重度产妇腰硬联合阻滞麻醉剖宫产重比重布比卡因ED50的比较[J].浙江医学,2014,36(1):61~63. [4] 谭正玲,詹鸿,刘先保,等.重度子痫前期孕妇与健康孕妇在腰硬联合麻醉下行剖宫产术发生低血压的风险比较[J].热带医学杂志,2015,15(2):210~213. [5] 施秀亚,胡华敏,封英.腰硬联合麻醉下剖宫产对重度子痫前期患者血流动力学的影响[J].中华全科医学,2016,14(12):2067~2069. [6] Budhwani H, Shivkumar P, Purandare C N, et al. Examining the use of magnesium sulfate to treat pregnant women with preeclampsia and eclampsia: results of a program assessment of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) training in India[J].Obstet Gynaecol India,2017,67(5):330~336. [7] 李桂英.腰硬联合麻醉在重度子痫前期剖宫产手术中的应用研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2015,24(26):2957~2959. [8] 黄若珠.腰-硬联合麻醉在重度先兆子痫患者剖宫产术中的应用[J].吉林医学,2010,31(28):4910~4912. [9] 贺晶,闫雪.腰硬联合麻醉与硬膜外麻醉对重度子痫前期剖宫产产妇血流动力学和新生儿Apgar评分的影响[J].中国实验诊断学,2016,20(10):1709~1712. [10] 郭云亮,范哲,王建设,等.腰硬联合麻醉在重度子痫前期孕妇剖宫产术中的临床应用价值[J].中国医学创新,2013,10(1):17~18. [11] 管锦生,陈小琳.小剂量舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因在重度子痫前期剖宫产术中的麻醉效果[J].福建医药杂志,2016,38(1):89~91. [12] Chumpathong S, Sirithanetbhol S, Salakij B, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing cesarean section: a 10-year retrospective study from a single tertiary care center: anesthetic point of view[J].Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2016,29(24):4096~4100. [13] 张秀海,尔丽绵.腰硬联合麻醉在重度子痫前期孕妇行剖宫产术的安全应用分析[J].中国临床医生杂志,2015,(9):69~71. [14] 谭正玲,詹鸿,刘先保,等.重度子痫前期孕妇与健康孕妇在腰硬联合麻醉下行剖宫产术发生低血压的风险比较[J].热带医学杂志,2015,15(2):210~213.
2018, Vol. 24 
冀公网安备13080202000677号