Abstract：Objective: To explore the application of etomidate plasma target controlled infusion combined with sevoflurane anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods: From October 2016 to October 2017, 80 cases of patients undergoing elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery were studied in our hospital. According to the simple random method, the patients were divided into control group and observation group. The control group was treated with propofol by plasma target controlled infusion, and the target controlled infusion of etomidate was used in the observation group. The changes of mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cognitive function change, awakening period and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups. Results: At the time of T1 and T2, the MAP level of the control group was higher than that of T0 time (P<0.05). When T1, T2 and T3 time, the HR level of the control group was higher than that of the T0 time (P<0.05); there was no statistically significant difference between the observation group and the control group at the time of T0 (P<0.05). The respiratory recovery time, the time of eye opening and extubation in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The restlessness score and OAAS score in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with before anesthesia, MMSE scores were decreased after operation in the two groups (P<0.05); the patients in the observation group after 6h, 24h, 48h, MMSE score higher than the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the control group was 22.50%, the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 7.50%, and the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion: Etomidate plasma target-controlled infusion combined with sevoflurane anesthesia can reduce the influence on circulatory system in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Moreover, the postoperative anesthesia recovery of this surgical program is faster, less impact on cognitive function of patients, higher safety.
[1] 梁伟颜.腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗卵巢囊肿的效果比较[J].中国临床新医学,2016,9(3):231~233. [2] 史军远.不同麻醉方式对妇科腹腔镜手术患者血流动力学影响的比较研究[J].延边医学,2015,18(4):156~157. [3] 刘朝辉.对行腹腔镜手术的老年妇科病患者实施靶控输注麻醉的效果分析[J].当代医药论丛,2016,14(7):148~149. [4] 李小兵.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者行不同全身麻醉早期认知功能的变化[J].医药前沿,2017,7(7):143~144. [5] 李丹,刘辉.妇科腹腔镜手术并发症的特点及预防治疗措施[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2017,13(5):596~600. [6] 刘雪芬.妇科腹腔镜手术并发症的临床分析及预防措施[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(8):155~156. [7] 李静,张丽,张玉倩.妇科腹腔镜手术并发症原因分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,9(9):75~78. [8] Prathep S, Mahattanaporn S, Wasinwong W. Target Controlled Infusion versus sevoflurane/desflurane anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison postoperative nausea/vomiting and extubation time.[J].Med Assoc Thai, 2015, 98(12):1187~1192. [9] Chen P N, Lu I C, Chen H M, et al. Desflurane reinforces the efficacy of propofol target-controlled infusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 2016, 32(1):32~37. [10] 冯锐,郑颖,刘江,等.靶控输注瑞芬太尼对丙泊酚药动学和血流动力学的影响[J].医药导报,2015,34(2):205~207. [11] 何欣,赵洪伟,李锦成.依托咪酯静脉维持麻醉对乳腺癌手术患者术后苏醒质量的影响[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2016,32(8):684~686. [12] 廖礼平,王曙红.全身麻醉术后患者苏醒期并发症发生情况调查分析[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(2):61~63.
2018, Vol. 24 
冀公网安备13080202000677号