Abstract：Objective: To explore the imaging manifestations of cervical cancer on TVCDS (Transvaginal Color Doppler Sonography) and analyze their correlation with tumor characteristics.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 98 patients with cervical cancer (cervical cancer group) admitted to our hospital from December 2018 to November 2023. Concurrently, 71 subjects with normal TVCDS results during physical examinations were included as a control group. Imaging data from TVCDS examinations of both groups were collected. Comparisons were made between the groups regarding blood flow signal grading, pathological characteristics, RI (Resistance Index), PSV (Peak Systolic Velocity), and EDV (End-Diastolic Velocity). Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between RI, PSV, EDV, and blood flow signal grading in patients with cervical cancer.Results: The RI value in the cervical cancer group was lower than that in the control group, while PSV and EDV values were higher (P<0.05). Among cervical cancer patients at different clinical stages, RI values were compared as follows: Stage I > Stage Ⅱ > Stage Ⅲ. In contrast, PSV and EDV values were compared as follows: Stage I < Stage Ⅱ < Stage Ⅲ. Patients with tumor diameter < 40mm and no lymph node metastasis had significantly higher RI values than those with tumor diameter ≥ 40mm and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). Comparisons of RI values among patients with different blood flow signal grades were as follows: Grade I > Grade Ⅱ > Grade Ⅲ. PSV and EDV values were compared as follows: Grade I < Grade Ⅱ < Grade Ⅲ (P<0.05). Correlation results indicated that RI was negatively correlated with blood flow signal grading (r=-0.411, P<0.001), while PSV and EDV were positively correlated with blood flow signal grading (r=0.396, 0.408, P<0.001).Conclusion: Changes in RI, PSV, and EDV values on TVCDS in patients with cervical cancer are closely related to their tumor pathological characteristics and blood flow signal grading.
杨丽英, 王莉, 梁小静, 陈伟杰, 孙荪. 宫颈癌TVCDS影像学表现及与肿瘤特征的相关性[J]. 河北医学, 2024, 30(6): 969-973.
YANG Liying, WANG Li, LIANG Xiaojing, et al. Imaging Manifestations of Cervical Cancer on TVCDS and Its Correlation with Tumor Characteristics. HeBei Med, 2024, 30(6): 969-973.
[1] 夏玲芳,朱俊,吴小华.2023年ESMO妇科肿瘤治疗最新进展及展望[J].中国癌症杂志,2023,33(11):969-980. [2] 程明艳,姜浩,孙亚男,等.HR-HPV基因联合TV-CDFI在宫颈癌筛查及诊断中的应用[J].影像科学与光化学,2022,40(6):1481-1485. [3] 周晖,白守民,林仲秋.《2019 NCCN宫颈癌临床实践指南(第1版)》解读[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2018,34(9):1002-1009. [4] 杜阳春,肖艳菊,郑红雨,等.彩色多普勒超声Adler分级与宫颈癌临床病理参数的相关性[J].广东医学,2019,40(11):1573-1578. [5] 刘会岭,仇清涛,常诚等.影像组学在宫颈癌中的研究进展[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2023,30(3):181-186. [6] 胡玉洁,涂红勤,曾洁,等.lncRNA CKMT2-AS1靶向miR-17-5p/TGFBR2分子轴调控子宫颈癌细胞的生物学行为[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2022,38(5):520-525. [7] 吴青京,陈昌钊,李波,等.经阴道超声和三维彩色血管能量成像单用及联用对宫颈癌分期的诊断效能研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2022,38(1):87-91. [8] 陈兰,闫磊,张慧颖,等.SMI和CDFI检测联合GI-RADS对卵巢肿瘤良恶性评估的研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2022,49(22):1170-1174. [9] Palsdottir K,Fridsten S,Blomqvist L,et al.Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2021,58(5):773-779. [10] Bayram F,Kender EN,Ozhan E,et al.The role of transvaginal color doppler indices to predict malignancy in abnormal uterine bleeding according to PALM-COEIN classification[J].Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod,2021,50(7):101988. [11] 孙小凡,刘贵朋.外周血炎症指标与宫颈癌临床病理特征的相关性[J].中国医科大学学报,2022,51(7):627-632. [12] 陈驰,程力,秦敏,等.多普勒超声检测RI,收缩期峰值血流速度与宫颈癌临床分期及病灶内血流的关系研究[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2023,24(3):319-320.
2024, Vol. 30 
冀公网安备13080202000677号