Abstract：Objective: To study the effects of different fluid resuscitation modes on hematocrit (HCT), serum lactic acid (BLA) and prognosis of patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Methods: The clinical data of 184 patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock admitted to the hospital between January 2017 ~ November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the fluid resuscitation mode, they were divided into observation group and control group, with 92 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with conventional limited fluid resuscitation, and patients in the observation group were treated with B-ultrasound monitored inferior vena cava variability guided fluid resuscitation. The fluid infusion volume, blood transfusion volume, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), HCT and BLA level were compared between the 2 groups, and prognosis of the 2 groups was analyzed. Results: The fluid infusion volume, blood transfusion volume and ICU stay of the observation group were significantly smaller/shorter than those of the control group (P<0. 05). 1h after resuscitation, PT, APTT and BLA level of the observation group were significantly shorter/lower than those of the control group (P<0. 05), and HCT was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0. 05). In the observation group, 7 patients developed multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), 6 patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and 3 patients died during hospitalization. In the control group, 10 patients developed MODS, 9 patients developed ARDS, and 7 patients died during hospitalization. There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of MODS, ARDS and death between the 2 groups (P>0. 05). Conclusion: B-ultrasound monitored inferior vena cava variability guided fluid resuscitation is simple to operate, and the monitoring indicators are more accurate. Compared with conventional limited fluid resuscitation, it can reduce the risks of coagulation dysfunction and other complications.
王萍, 李乐, 舒能媛, 陶凯, 曾美. 液体复苏对创伤失血性休克患者血细胞比容血清乳酸和预后的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(12): 2047-2051.
WANG Ping, LI Le, SHU Nengyuan, et al. Effects of Fluid Resuscitation on Hematocrit, Serum Lactic Acid and Prognosis of Patients with Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock. HeBei Med, 2022, 28(12): 2047-2051.
[1] 邵志林,杜召辉,王如意,等.不同目标血压复苏对创伤失血性休克患者外周血炎性因子和血流动力学的影响[J].中华危重病急救医学,2019,31(4):428-433. [2] 许嵩翱,郁慧杰,曹伟,等.急诊超声在严重创伤失血性休克患者病情评估及救治中的应用研究[J].重庆医学,2020,49(S1):141-142. [3] Jones AR,Miller JL,Jansen JO,et al.Whole blood for resuscitation of traumatic hemorrhagic shock in adults[J].Adv Emerg Nurs,2021,43(4):344-354. [4] Pitotti C,David J.An evidence-based approach to nonoperative management of traumatic hemorrhagic shock in the emergency department[J].Emerg Med Pract,2020,22(11):1-24. [5] Cable CA,Razavi SA,Roback JD,et al.RBC transfusion strategies in the ICU:a concise review[J].Crit Care Med.2019,47(11):1637-1644. [6] skender Uysal P,ahin Kavakl H,Neeliolu S.Evaluation of the thiol disulfide homeostasis in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2021,27(5):516-525. [7] 柯慧娟,吴爽,马琴琴,等.重症超声引导下液体复苏与早期目标导向治疗对复苏效果血流动力学和氧代谢指标的影响[J].中国急救医学,2021,41(8):676-682. [8] Jiang LM,He J,Xi XY,et al.Effect of early restrictive fluid resuscitation on inflammatory and immune factors in patients with severe pelvic fracture[J].Chin Traumatol,2019,22(6):311-315. [9] 刘双庆,佘飞,张为,等.血乳酸、随机血糖联合RTS评分系统在创伤失血性休克中的预测价值[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2020,29(12):1601-1605. [10] 王志,刘野,滕乐,等.下腔静脉变异度在容量复苏中的临床应用[J].广东医学,2019,40(24):3469-3471,3475. [11] Khan RA,Khan NA,Bauer SR,et al.Association between volume of fluid resuscitation and intubation in high-risk patients with sepsis,heart failure,end-stage renal disease,and cirrhosis[J].Chest,2020,157(2):286-292.
2022, Vol. 28 
冀公网安备13080202000677号