探讨急性重症胆囊炎行微创治疗手术时机的研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.11.011

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (1213 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的: 探讨急性重症胆囊炎行微创治疗手术时机的研究。方法: 选取2018年1月至2021年12月在我院就诊的急性重症胆囊炎患者55例为研究对象,根据患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)手术时机的不同分为LC组25例和PTGD联合LC组30例。LC组均行LC,PTGD联合LC组先行超声引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术(PTGD)后5至8周再行LC。比较两组患者相关临床指标。结果: 两组患者年龄、性别、体质量指数(BMI)、麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级方面比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),LC组术前经腹部彩超检测胆囊壁厚度大于PTGD联合LC组(P<0.001)。与LC组相比,PTGD联合LC组行LC手术时间较短,术中出血量及术中胆囊三角粘连例数较少,白细胞及体温恢复正常时间、拔除腹腔引流管时间及术后首次排气时间较早(P<0.05);PTGD联合LC组行LC术后谷丙转氨酶、γ-谷氨酰基转移酶、C反应蛋白、降钙素原及术后并发症总发生率均低于LC组,术后前白蛋白及超氧化物歧化酶水平均高于LC组(均P<0.001)。LC组和PTGD联合LC组病人中转开腹发生率比0.00%:3.33%,组间比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论: 对于急性重症胆囊炎病人,超声引导下PTGD后行LC,能减轻术中粘连程度,促进术后早期快速恢复,减轻术前、术中胆囊的炎症反应,改善肝功能状态,也能够降低术后并发症发生率,是一种安全、可行的治疗措施。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术, 腹腔镜胆囊切除手术, 急性重症胆囊炎

Abstract：Objective: To investigate the timing of minimally invasive surgery for acute severe cholecystitis.Methods: Fifty five patients with acute severe cholecystitis who visited our hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were selected as the study subjects, and the patients were divided into LC group (25 cases) and PTGD combined with LC group (30 cases) according to the different surgical timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The LC group all underwent LC, and the PTGD combined with LC group received LC before 5-8 weeks after initial ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholecystocentesis catheter drainage (PTGD). Patient related clinical indicators were compared between the two groups. Results: there were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and society of anesthesiologists (ASA) grade between the two groups (P>0.05), and the gallbladder wall thickness measured by preoperative transabdominal color ultrasound in the LC group was greater than that in the PTGD combined with LC group (P<0.001). Compared with the LC group, the PTGD combined with LC group had a shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative adhesion of the gallbladder trigone, a shorter time for the return of white blood cells and body temperature to normal, the time for the removal of abdominal drainage tube and the time for the first postoperative flatus (P<0.05); PTGD combined with LC group had postoperative alanine transaminase γ- The overall incidences of glutamyltransferase, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and postoperative complications were lower in the LC group, and the postoperative prealbumin and superoxide dismutase levels were higher in the LC group (all P<0.001). The incidence ratio of conversion to open was 0.00%: 3.33% in LC group and PTGD combined with LC group patients, and there was no statistical difference between groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: in patients with acute severe cholecystitis, LC performed after ultrasound-guided PTGD is a safe and feasible treatment to relieve the degree of intraoperative adhesion, promote early and rapid postoperative recovery, attenuate the inflammatory response of the gallbladder before and during surgery, improve liver function status, and also reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Key words： Percutaneous transhepatic cholecystectomy and catheter drainage Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Acute severe cholecystitis

基金资助:河北省医学科学研究重点课题,(编号:20180082、20190382)

引用本文:

陈旭光, 温军业, 单昆昆, 于瀚翔, 江建军. 探讨急性重症胆囊炎行微创治疗手术时机的研究[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(11): 1816-1821.
CHEN Xuguang, WEN Junye, SHAN Kunkun, et al. To investigate the time of minimally invasive operation for acute severe cholecystitis. HeBei Med, 2022, 28(11): 1816-1821.

链接本文:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.11.011 或 http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2022/V28/I11/1816

[1] 郭永前.腹腔镜手术治疗老年急性胆囊炎60例临床分析[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(14):66-68.
[2] 常加伟,张剑林,陈卫东,等.胆囊穿刺置管造口引流术对老年急性化脓坏疽性胆囊炎患者的临床疗效及安全性[J].肝胆外科杂志,2017,25(4):289-291.
[3] 孙明明,范逸怡,党胜春.早期不同时间点行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017,26(08):1019-1029.
[4] Peng W K, Sheikh Z, Nixon S J, et al. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease[J]. Br Surg,2010,92(5):586-591.
[5] Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Surg Endosc,2018,32(12):4728-4741.
[6] 高瑞岗,李奎,冯宝华,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗508例急性结石性胆囊炎的临床总结[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(3):322-324,329.
[7] Liu J G, Wu J, Wang J, et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a Systematic review and meta-analysis.[J].Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2018,28(9):1053-1060.
[8] 中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组.急性胆道系统感染的诊断和治疗指南(2021版)[J].中华外科杂志,2021,59(06):422-429.
[9] 罗程,宋玖珊,梁琨,等.经皮肝穿刺胆囊引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术与急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术对中度急性胆囊炎疗效的Meta分析[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2020,32(6):364-370.
[10] Ogura T, Higuchi K. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: current status and future prospects[J].Dig Endosc,2019,31(1):55-64.
[11] Jia B , Kai L , Tan L , et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating acute complicated cholecystitis[J]. Am Surg,2018,84(1):133-136.