Abstract：Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of primary suture (PC) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis (AC).Methods: The clinical and follow-up data of 50 patients with non-severe acute cholangitis who underwent LCBDE from March 2018 to March 2020 in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hebei Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology were selected, and the clinical indexes of 25 cases with primary suture of common bile duct (PC groups) and 25 cases with T-tube drainage (T-tube group) were compared. Results: Of the 50 patients, 49 cases were successfully operated, and 1 case was converted to laparotomy. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, acute cholangitis (AC) grade, acute cholecystitis cases, common bile duct diameter, preoperative complications, clinical symptoms and signs between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in serum total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DBIL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). Compared with T-tube group, PC group had shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter abdominal drainage time and shorter postoperative hospital stay, and the differences were statistically significant (t/z/P =6.144/<0.001,2.143/0.032,2.504/0.016,2.561/0.014). There were no residual stones, injury of adjacent organs during operation and death in hospital in both groups. The total incidence of postoperative complications such as biliary fistula, abdominal hemorrhage, electrolyte disturbance, venous thrombosis of lower limbs, pleural effusion, nausea and vomiting in PC group was not significantly different from that in T-tube group (χ2=2.228, P=0.136). During the follow-up, no biliary stricture occurred in the two groups, and 2 patients in T-tube group had stone recurrence. Conclusion: PC after LCBDE in patients with non-severe AC choledocholithiasis has shown better clinical outcomes than the T-tube group in terms of operative time, intraoperative bleeding, abdominal drainage time and postoperative hospital stay, making it a safe and feasible treatment option.
温军业, 单昆昆, 张曼, 于瀚翔, 陈旭光, 江建军. 非重症急性胆管炎患者行腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合与T管引流的比较[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(10): 1667-1671.
WEN Junye, SHAN Kunkun, ZHANG Man, et al. Comparison of Primary Suture and T-Tube Drainage During Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients without Severe Acute Cholangitis. HeBei Med, 2022, 28(10): 1667-1671.
[1] 冯拥璞,高野,辛磊,等.困难胆总管结石的内镜治疗进展[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2021,37(1): 229-232. [2] Kiriyama S,Kozaka K,Takada T,et al.Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos)[J].Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2018,25(1): 17-30. [3] Lee S J,Choii S,Moon J I,et al.Comparison of one-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy and two-stage endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones in patients over 80 years old[J].Minim Invasive Surg,2022,25(1): 11-17. [4] Thuluvath A J,Ahn J C,Rattan P,et al.Evaluation of charcot triad,reynolds pentad,and tokyo guidelines for diagnosis of cholangitis secondary to choledocholithiasis across patient age groups[J].Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes,2021,5(2): 377-387. [5] Jia B,Jin Z,Han W,et al.Safety and efficacy of emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients with complicated acute cholangitis[J].Surg Endosc,2020,34(3): 1330-1335. [6] Zou Q,Ding Y,Li C S,et al.A randomized controlled trial of emergency LCBDE + LC and ERCP + LC in the treatment of choledocholithiasis with acute cholangitis[J].Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2022,17(1): 156-162. [7] Zou Q,Ding Y,Li CS,et al.A randomized controlled trial of emergency LCBDE + LC and ERCP + LC in the treatment of choledocholithiasis with acute cholangitis[J].Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2022,17(1):156-162. [8] Zhen W,Xu-zhen W,NAN-TAO F,et al.Primary closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous biliary surgery[J].Am Surg,2021,87(1): 50-55. [9] Zhu T, Lin H, Sun J, et al. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis[J].Zhejiang Univ Sci B,2021,22(12):985-1001. [10] Jiang Y,Zhang J,Li W,et al.Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis[J].Updates Surg,2022,74(3): 899-906. [11] Deng Y,Tian H W,He L J,et al.Can T-tube drainage be replaced by primary suture technique in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2020,405(8): 1209-1217. [12] Zhan Z,Han H,Zhao D,et al.Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is feasible for elderly patients: 5-year experience at a single institution[J].Asian Surg,2020,43(1): 110-115. [13] Cianci P,Restini E.Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: endoscopic and surgical approaches[J].World Gastroenterol,2021,27(28): 4536-4554.
2022, Vol. 28 
冀公网安备13080202000677号