Abstract：Objective: To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology with different sizes of thyroid nodules. Methods: A retrospective analysis method was used to collect the clinical data of patients with thyroid nodules found in the outpatient department of our hospital from April 2018 to April 2021. All patients underwent high-resolution ultrasound, US-FNAC and histopathological examination. According to the maximum diameter of the nodules, 136 nodules finally included in the study were divided into four groups. Group A: the maximum diameter was 4~5mm.Group B: 6~10mm.Group C: 11~20mm. Group D:>20mm. The Bethesda classification of patients with different diameters of thyroid nodules and its relationship with pathological diagnosis results were compared and the diagnostic efficacy of US-FNAC for different diameter thyroid nodules was analyzed. Results: In the Bethesda classification results of US-FNAC cytopathology, there were 1 in category I, 59 in category II, 2 in category III, 2 in category IV, 38 in category V, and 37 in category VI. The malignant rates were 0.00 %, 30.56%, 0.00 %, 100.00 %, 97.37 %, and 100.00 %, respectively, according to the pathological results after operation. The undiagnosed rate of US-FNAC in group A was the highest (4.76 %), but there was no significant difference in the undiagnosed rate between groups (P>0.05). The frequency difference of positive and negative US-FNAC results in ABCD groups was statistically significant (P20 mm nodules had the highest diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy, 100.0 % and 98.3 %, respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of 4~5 mm nodules were low, 92.9% and 90.1 %, respectively. Conclusion: US-FNAC has high value in diagnosing thyroid nodules of different sizes. It has high diagnostic accuracy for thyroid nodules of 11~20mm and >20mm. Patients with thyroid nodules of 4~5mm should be actively followed up. It can be combined with hematological examination or molecular marker detection in clinical diagnosis to avoid missed diagnosis.
杨增娣, 杨艳婷, 吕永燕, 任明磊, 童清平. 不同甲状腺结节大小超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学诊断敏感性和准确性比较[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(1): 81-85.
YANG Zengdi, YANG Yanting, LV Yongyan, et al. Comparison of the Sensitivity and Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for Different Thyroid Nodules. HeBei Med, 2022, 28(1): 81-85.
[1] 王颖,徐冰,康慧莉,等.声触诊组织成像和定量技术与螺旋CT对甲状腺结节良恶性应用比较[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2021,19(5):140~143. [2] 骆鹏飞,穆夏黎,焦大海,等.甲状腺结节细针穿刺细胞学检查标本充分性的影响因素[J].中华医学杂志,2020,100(24):1913~1916. [3] 王明辉,马英路,崔广和,等.细针穿刺细胞学检查和超声弹性成像及超声造影对甲状腺癌的诊断价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2018,34(1):9~13. [4] 上海市医学会超声医学分会介入学组.超声引导下甲状腺结节细针穿刺细胞学检查实践指南(2019版)[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2020,29(5):369~383. [5] Cibas ES,Ali SZ.The bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology[J].Thyroid,2009,19(11):1159~1165. [6] 聂云雷,侯庆玲,张呈祥.超声弹性成像应变率比值法与MSCT在诊断甲状腺结节中的应用[J].河北医学,2021,27(1):128~131. [7] Graciano AJ,Fischer CA,Chone CT,et al.Efficacy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration performed by surgeons newly trained in thyroid ultrasound[J].Head Neck,2017,39(3):439~442. [8] 汪冠军.甲状腺结节超声引导细针穿刺细胞学检查的临床应用价值[J].河南外科学杂志,2021,27(1):121~122. [9] Reeves M,Patel R,Harmston C.Surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules is cost effective and efficient:evaluation of thyroid nodule assessment in a provincial New Zealand hospital[J].N Z Med,2019,132(1506):60~65. [10] Aydogan Bisahin M,Ceyhan K,et al.The influence of thyroid nodule size on the diagnostic efficacy and accuracy of ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration cytology[J].Diagn Cytopathol,2019,47(7):682~687. [11] 方达,马雯婷,徐露,等.超声引导下细针穿刺在不同大小甲状腺结节中的鉴别诊断[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(12):1806~1809. [12] Xia JJ,Li MS,Zheng L,et al.Nondiagnostic cytological results on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration:does the thyroid nodule depth matter[J] Clin Hemorheol Microcirc,2017,67(2):115~124. [13] de la Serna Higuera C.Response to cervicothoracic abscess secondary to transesophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration[J].Gastroenterol Hepatol,2019,42(7):458.
2022, Vol. 28 
冀公网安备13080202000786号