Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Microscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery and Traditional Craniotomy Surgery for Parasagittal Sinus and Parafalx Cerebri Meningiomas
HUANG Bin, TAN Zhiling, WANG Rongyan, et al
Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Hunan Chenzhou 423099, China
Abstract：Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of microsurgery with traditional craniotomy in the treatment of parasagittal sinus meningiomas and parafalx meningiomas. Methods: From January 2015 to January 2018, 86 patients with parasagittal sinus meningiomas and parafalx meningiomas in our hospital were selected for the study. They were divided into observation group (46 cases) and control group (40 cases) by simple random number table method. Observation group was treated with microsurgery and control group with traditional craniotomy. The perioperative condition, Simpson grade of tumor resection, symptom relief and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time in the observation group was significantly longer than those in the control group, the amount of bleeding and blood transfusion during operation were significantly less than those in the control group, and the hospitalization time was significantly shorter than those in the control group(P＜0.05). The Simpson grading of tumor resection between the two groups has statistically significant (P＜0.05). After operation, the symptoms of limb dysfunction, sensory disturbance and epilepsy in the observation group were significantly improved compared with those before operation, while the limb dysfunction in the control group were significantly improved (P＜0.05). The limb dysfunction in the observation group was significantly lower than those in the control group (P＜0.05). In the follow-up results showed that the total recurrence rate in the observation group was significantly lower than those in the control group (P＜0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional craniotomy surgery, the microsurgical minimally invasive surgery is more effective for parasagittal sinus and parafalx cerebri meningiomas, it has the advantages of less trauma, promoting the recovery of clinical symptoms and low recurrence rate., which is worthy of application and promotion.
黄斌, 谭智灵, 王荣彦, 白桂斌, 廖佐明, 岳晓, 罗忠平, 邓人富. 显微镜下微创切除手术与传统开颅手术对矢状窦旁及大脑镰旁脑膜瘤的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 河北医学, 2020, 26(4): 681-686.
HUANG Bin, TAN Zhiling, WANG Rongyan, et al. Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Microscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery and Traditional Craniotomy Surgery for Parasagittal Sinus and Parafalx Cerebri Meningiomas. HeBei Med, 2020, 26(4): 681-686.
[1] 柯超,陈忠平.脑膜瘤的治疗现状与思考[J].广东医学,2017,38(24):3705~3707. [2] Oommen A, Pratap T, Chandi S, et al. Parasellar extra-axial cavernoma mimicking meningioma: a case report[J]. Neuroimmunity and Neuritis (English Edition),2017,4(1):16~19. [3] 王兴铧,杜嘉庚.显微手术治疗矢状窦旁及大脑镰旁脑膜瘤的疗效研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2017,20(17):2143~2146. [4] Brunomascarenhas MA, Ramesh VG, Venkatraman S, et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the superior sagittal sinus and draining veins[J]. Neurology India, 2017, 65(4): 794~800. [5] 王忠诚.神经外科学[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,2005.602~604. [6] 陈冰,董芳媛,卢林明,等.脑膜瘤544例临床病理构成分析[J].山西医科大学学报,2019,50(04):489~492. [7] Portelli M, Papageorgiou PN. An update on idiopathic intracranial hypertension[J]. Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 152(2): 1~9. [8] 石士奎,张平,程敬亮.脑膜瘤发病机制与MRI诊断研究进展[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2018,41(03):308~312. [9] Georgoulis G, Sindou M. Parasagittal meningioma (posterior third) occluding the superior sagittal sinus: complete resection and venous repair: 3-dimensional operative video[J]. Oper Neurosurg, 2017, 13(2): 283~284. [10] 刘志刚,李华,张志银,等.显微外科与常规手术治疗功能区矢状窦镰旁脑膜瘤的疗效对比[J].实用癌症杂志,2017,32(03):505~507. [11] 徐义昌,许兴,赵昌平,等.矢状窦旁脑膜瘤显微手术治疗36例体会[J].皖南医学院学报,2018,37(04):369~371. [12] Elzarief A A, Ibrahim M F. Long-term follow-up of motor function deterioration following microsurgical resection of middle third parasagittal and falx meningioma[J]. Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry & Neurosurgery, 2018, 54(1):9.
2020, Vol. 26 
冀公网安备13080202000677号