2025年4月4日 星期五
首页        期刊介绍        编委会        投稿指南        期刊订阅        广告合作        联系我们        English
河北医学  2020, Vol. 26 Issue (10): 1693-1697    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2020.10.026
  临床研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
不同剂量右美托咪定与不同剂量丙泊酚在纤支镜引导气管插管中的应用比较
丛露, 王珊娟
上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院, 上海 200001
Comparison of Different Dosages of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Guided Endotracheal Intubation
CONG Lu, WANG Shanjuan
Renji Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200001, China
全文: PDF (1176 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的: 探究不同剂量右美托咪定与不同剂量丙泊酚在纤支镜引导气管插管中的应用。方法: 选取2017年1月至2019年1月在我院行纤支镜引导气管插管的患者80例患者,按右美托咪定与丙泊酚的麻醉给予量分为四组,每组20例。比较两组患者入室时(T0)、给药前(T1)、给药后(T2)、插管前(T3)、插管成功即刻(T4)、插管成功后3min(T5)6个时刻血流动力学指标MAP、HR、SpO2的变化,插管一次成功率、呼吸暂停时间、气管插管完成时间以及不良反应镇静过度、呼吸抑制、恶心呕吐、呛咳、心动过缓的发生率。结果: 重复测量方差分析显示HR、SpO2、MAP时间因素及时间因素和分组的交互作用均有统计学意义(P<0.05);进一步两两比较显示,各组T2、T3、T4时刻SpO2值明显低于T0时时刻,各组T2、T3、T4时刻MAP值明显高于T0时时刻;A组HR、SpO2、MAP随时间的波动小于B组,B组小于C组,C组小于D组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。D组插管一次成功率(70.00%)明显低于A组(95.00%)、C组(95.00%),C组呼吸暂停时间明显高于A组、B组、D组,C组气管插管完成时间明显低于A组、B组、D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。C组呼吸抑制、心动过缓的发生率明显高于其他三组,D组呛咳的发生率明显高于其他三组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: 不同剂量右美托咪定与不同剂量丙泊酚应用于纤支镜引导气管插管均安全有效,且以1.0μg/kg右美托咪定和0.8mg/kg丙泊酚在稳定血流动力学、提高插管成功率、降低不良反应方面较为适宜。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
丛露
王珊娟
关键词 纤支镜气管插管右美托咪定剂量丙泊酚    
AbstractObjective: To explore the application of different dosages of dexmedetomidine and propofol in tracheal intubation guided by fiberbronchoscope. Methods: From January 2017 to January 2019, 80 patients undergoing bronchofiberscope guided endotracheal intubation in our hospital were divided into four groups with 20 cases in each group according to the anesthesia dosage of dexmedetomidine and propofol. The hemodynamic indexes MAP, HR and SpO2 at T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 were compared between the two groups. Results: Repeated measurement analysis of variance showed that HR, SpO2, MAP time factors, time factors and group interaction were statistically significant (P<0.05); further comparison between the two groups showed that SpO2 value at T2, T3, T4 time was significantly lower than that at to time, map value at T2, T3, T4 time was significantly higher than that at to time; the fluctuation of HR, SpO2, MAP with time in group A was smaller than that in group B, group B was smaller than that in group C, and group C was smaller than that in group D, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The success rate of intubation in group D (70.00%) was significantly lower than that in group A (95.00%) and group C (95.00%), the time of apnea in group C was significantly higher than that in group A, group B, group D, the time of intubation in group C was significantly lower than that in group A, group B, group D (P<0.05). The incidence of respiratory inhibition and bradycardia in group C was significantly higher than that in the other three groups, and the incidence of cough in group D was significantly higher than that in the other three groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Different dosages of dexmedetomidine and different doses of propofol are safe and effective in fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided endotracheal intubation, and 1.0 μ g / kg dexmedetomidine and 0.8 mg / kg propofol are suitable for stabilizing hemodynamics, improving the success rate of intubation and reducing adverse reactions.
Key wordsBronchoscope    Endotracheal intubation    Dexmedetomidine    Dose    Propofol
    
通讯作者: 王珊娟   
引用本文:   
丛露, 王珊娟. 不同剂量右美托咪定与不同剂量丙泊酚在纤支镜引导气管插管中的应用比较[J]. 河北医学, 2020, 26(10): 1693-1697.
CONG Lu, WANG Shanjuan. Comparison of Different Dosages of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Guided Endotracheal Intubation. HeBei Med, 2020, 26(10): 1693-1697.
链接本文:  
http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2020.10.026     或     http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2020/V26/I10/1693
冀ICP备2025106803号    冀公网安备13080202000786号
版权所有 © 2016 《河北医学》杂志社
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发