Abstract:Objective: To explore the anesthesia effects of propofol-ruifentanil and sevoflurane-ruifentanil druing the laparoscopic hysterectomy and the influence on pneumodynamics. Methods: 106 cases of patients with laparoscopic hysterectomy in our hospital were selected as the research object, and were divided into sevoflurane group (n=53) and propofol group (n=53) according to the random number table. Two groups were induced by ruifentanil anesthesia, propofol group was given propofol to maintain anesthesia, while sevoflurane group was treated with sevoflurane anesthesia. The effects of 2 groups were compared, and the changes of pneumodynamics indexes were compared between 2 groups. Results: There was no significant difference in anesthesia maintenance time between sevoflurane group and propofol group (P>0.05), but the spontaneous breathing recovery time, recovery time, extubation time, verbal response time, eye opening time of sevoflurane group were earlier than propofol group (P<0.01); compared with after intubation 5 min, Paw and PIP of 2 groups after pneumoperitoneum 10 min and after pneumoperitoneum 30 min significantly increased, Cdyn decreased significantly (P<0.01), and Paw of treatment group was lower than that of control group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in Paw, PIP, Cdyn between 2 groups after pneumoperitoneum 5 min and after minintubation 5 min (P>0.05); There was no significant change in the BIS between 5 min after intubation and 5 min after pneumoperitoneum in both groups (P>0.05), but the BIS value in sevoflurane group was significantly higher than that in propofol group (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the MAP, CO, SVR and ACI after intubation 5 min between the 2 groups (P>0.05), compared with after intubation 5 min, the MAP and SVR levels after pneumoperitoneum 10 minutes and after pneumoperitoneum 30 min increased significantly, the SVR significantly increased in 2 groups (P<0.01), the ACI of sevoflurane group was lower than that of propofol group (P<0.01); There was no significant difference in CO between 2 groups at different time points and between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Sevoflurane combined with remifentanil and propofol combined with remifentanil during laparoscopic hysterectomy has a same anesthesia time, and has effect on pneumodynamics after establishing pneumoperitoneum, but sevoflurane combined with remifentanil can make the patients in a shorter period of time to recover and restore consciousness, reduce lung injury, and the effect on hemodynamics was relatively small.
孙旺春. 丙泊酚或七氟醚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉对腹腔镜子宫全切术患者的麻醉效果[J]. 河北医学, 2018, 24(7): 1086-1090.
SUN Wangchun. Anesthesia Effects of Propofol-ruifendanil or Sevoflurane-ruifentanil during the Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. HeBei Med, 2018, 24(7): 1086-1090.
[1] 张诚章,梁国森,李振威.第三代喉罩与I-gel喉罩对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者呼吸力学影响的比较[J].实用医院临床杂志,2015,11(2):76~78. [2] 钟媛,李新白,耿娜,等.预先肺复张策略结合肺保护通气对老年患者腹腔镜手术中动脉血氧合作用及呼吸力学的影响[J].医学研究杂志,2016,45(4):138~141. [3] Neira V M, Kovesi T, Guerra L, et al. The impact of pneumoperitoneum and trendelenburg positioning on respiratory system mechanics during laparoscopic pelvic surgery in children: a prospective observational study[J]. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2015, 62(7): 798~806. [4] 王鑫宇,吕洁萍,张文凯,等.七氟烷对后腹腔镜手术呼吸力学和血浆内皮素-1的影响[J].当代医学,2015,25(10):1~3. [5] 吴友华,林俊杰,梅雨柳,等.老年腹腔镜胆囊切除围术期不同麻醉药物对呼吸力学与炎症反应的影响[J].现代实用医学,2015,27(5):640~642. [6] 邓国华.腹腔镜手术患者应用七氟醚和丙泊酚麻醉的效果及安金性研究[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(19):4368~4369. [7] 蔡军,于刚,缪江波,等.七氟醚吸入麻醉、丙泊酚静脉麻醉在小儿腹腔镜手术中的应用效果比较[J].山东医药,2015,55(40):74~76. [8] 毛雪娣.七氟醚或丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼合用在妇科腹腔镜麻醉中的应用[J].中国医学创新,2015,12(11):133~135. [9] Si R B, Sang E L, Ahn H J, et al. Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy[J]. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 2014, 66(2): 131~135. [10] Ozdogan H K, Cetinkunar S, Karateke F, et al. The effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on the hemodynamcs and respiratory functions in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2016, 35(1): 441~445.