2025年4月4日 星期五
首页        期刊介绍        编委会        投稿指南        期刊订阅        广告合作        联系我们        English
河北医学  2018, Vol. 24 Issue (12): 2092-2095    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2018.12.040
  临床研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
外固定架与DVR解剖锁定板治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效比较分析
张昕,白志强
北京市第一中西医结合医院骨科, 北京 100025
Comparative Analysis of Clinical Effects of External Fixator and DVR Anatomical Locking Plate in the treatment of Type C Distal Radius Fracture
ZHANG Xin, BAI Zhiqiang
The First Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western medicine, Beijing 100025, China
全文: PDF (1348 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  目的: 探讨在C型桡骨远端骨折治疗中应用外固定架和DVR解剖锁定钢板的临床效果差异。方法: 选取2015年8月至2017年6月C型桡骨远端骨折患者80例,对其治疗情况进行回顾性分析,按照手术方法的不同将其分为观察A组(DVR解剖锁定钢板)和观察B组(外固定架),对两组患者的手术效果和术后恢复情况进行评估分析。结果: 观察A组患者尺偏角、掌倾角均明显优于观察B组,差异具有显著性(P<0.05);在术后3个月、6个月、12个月时,观察A组患者腕关节Gartland-Werlev评分均明显低于观察B组,差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论: 采用DVR解剖锁定钢板和外固定架治疗C型桡骨远端骨折均可有效促进患者术后腕关节功能的恢复,但同外固定架相比,采用DVR解剖锁定钢板对此类患者进行治疗可取得更为有效的固定效果,有利于患者术后早期功能锻炼的开展,对于促进其腕关节功能的恢复具有十分积极的作用,建议在临床推广应用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张昕
白志强
关键词 C型桡骨远端骨折骨折固定术外固定器DVR解剖锁定钢板    
AbstractObjective:To explore the clinical effects of external fixation and DVR anatomical locking plate in the treatment of type C distal radius fractures. Methods: Eighty patients with type C distal radius fracture treated in our hospital from August 2015 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into group A (DVR anatomical locking plate) and group B (external fixator) according to different surgical methods. The operative effect and postoperative recovery of the two groups were analyzed. Evaluation analysis. Results: The ulnar and palmar angles of group A were significantly better than those of group B (P<0.05). At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation, the Gartland_Werlev score of wrist joint in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P<0.05). Conclusion: The use of DVR anatomical locking plate and external fixation for the treatment of type C distal radius fractures can effectively promote the recovery of postoperative wrist function, but compared with external fixation, DVR anatomical locking plate can be used to treat such patients. More effective fixation effect is conducive to the early development of functional exercise in patients, and has a very positive effect on promoting the recovery of wrist function. It is recommended to be applied in clinic.
Key wordsC-type distal radius fracture    Fracture fixation    External fixator    DVR anatomical locking plate
    
基金资助:北京市科技计划项目,(编号:201202127)
通讯作者: 白志强   
引用本文:   
张昕,白志强. 外固定架与DVR解剖锁定板治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效比较分析[J]. 河北医学, 2018, 24(12): 2092-2095.
ZHANG Xin, BAI Zhiqiang. Comparative Analysis of Clinical Effects of External Fixator and DVR Anatomical Locking Plate in the treatment of Type C Distal Radius Fracture. HeBei Med, 2018, 24(12): 2092-2095.
链接本文:  
http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2018.12.040     或     http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2018/V24/I12/2092
冀ICP备2025106803号    冀公网安备13080202000786号
版权所有 © 2016 《河北医学》杂志社
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发