Abstract：Objective: To compare and analyze the difference between lumbar spinal anesthesia and ropivacaine hydrochloride for labor analgesia and Doula analgesia. Methods: From March 2017 to December 2018, 200 primiparas who were required to perform labor analgesia with nerve and muscle stimulator in our hospital were used as control group (group A) and 400 primiparae who were required to undergo combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia. According to the order of admission of puerpera, they were randomly divided into B1 group and B2 group, 200 patients in each group. The analgesic effect, labor duration, uterine contraction, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal Apger score and the degree of motor block were observed and recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in age, height, weight, gestational age and operation time between the study group and the control group (P>0.05). The analgesic effect of group B1 and B 2 was significantly higher than that of group A (P<0. 05), but the analgesic effect of group 0 was significantly higher than that of group A and group B1 (, (P<0. 05). The time of active period and the second stage of labor in group B1 and B2 were significantly longer than those in group A (P<0.05) and the active period in group B1 was significantly shorter than that in group B2 (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference among the three groups (P> 0.0). 5) the amount of postpartum hemorrhage in group B 1 and group B2 was significantly higher than that in group A (P<0 05), and the amount of postpartum hemorrhage in group B1 was significantly lower than that in group B 2 (P<0 05), and there was no difference in Apger scores among the three groups (P> 0 05). The degree of motor block in group A was significantly higher than that in group B1 (P<0.05). Conclusion: The analgesic effect of injection of ropivacaine hydrochloride by injection of lumbar anesthesia is better than the analgesic effect of the guide instrument. In group B1, the regimen of lumbar anesthesia is shorter than that in the B2 group, and the effect on the uterine contraction is small, and the effect of labor analgesia is the best.
宋阳,高扬,张祎明,郭东侠,张力方,苏凤龙,孙鹏. 腰麻差异量盐酸罗哌卡因分娩镇痛与导乐仪镇痛的临床对比研究[J]. 河北医学, 2018, 24(12): 2086-2089.
SONG Yang, GAO Yang, ZHANG Yiming, et al. Study on the Clinical Comparation of Different Dosage of Ropivacaine Hydrochloride for Labor Analgesia and Doula Analgesia. HeBei Med, 2018, 24(12): 2086-2089.
[1] Hu L Q, Zhang J, Wong C A, et al. Impact of the introduction of neuraxial labor analgesia on mode of delivery at an urban maternity hospital in China[J]. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, 2015, 129(1):17~21. [2] 何凤美.全程腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛对第二产程及分娩方式的影响分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2015,9(8):144~145. [3] 宋爽.剖宫产术中不同剂量罗哌卡因等比重腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉对母婴RAAS系统的影响研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(3):658~659. [4] 任晓娅,刘艳云,田亚菊,等.导乐分娩配合GT-4A导乐分娩镇痛仪在阴道分娩中的临床应用[J].海南医学,2015,26(6):825~827. [5] 颜君宇,乌力亚提,赵锋河,等.硬膜外麻醉下不同浓度罗哌卡因对分娩镇痛产妇的影响[J].新疆医学,2017,47(10):1134~1137. [6] 杨家道,谭燕萍,秦用华,等.舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因与芬太尼复合罗哌卡因在分娩镇痛临床应用中的比较[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015,25(10):102~105. [7] 王大伟,王保国,刘长宝.不同剂量罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼腰-硬联合阻滞在产程潜伏期分娩镇痛的效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2015,31(6):538~542. [8] 武富云.导乐镇痛分娩仪用于分娩镇痛的临床观察[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2015,2(4):129~130.
2018, Vol. 24 
冀公网安备13080202000786号