Effect of Auripuncture Tympanic Positive Pressure Lavage and Negative Pressure Drainage for Dry Ear Rate and Other Therapeutic Effects Index of Secretory Otitis Media
WANG Ling, LUO Wei
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China
Abstract:Objective: To study effect of auripuncture tympanic positive pressure lavage and negative pressure drainage for dry ear rate and other therapeutic effects index of secretory otitis media. Methods: From August 2012 to August 2014 105 patients (112 ears) with surgical treatment in our hospital were selected as the research object. In accordance with the operation mode divided into observation group (auripuncture tympanic positive pressure lavage and negative pressure drainage) of 51 cases (56 ears) and the control group (tympanic conventional lavage) of 54 cases (56 ears). Followed up for 1 years, the two groups were compared with the near and long-term effects, as well as the treatment of ear related indicators. Results: The total effective rate was 94.64% in the observation group, whereas it was 76.79% in the control group(P < 0.05). The dry ear rate of observation group in 3, 6 and 12 months were 94.64%, 96.43% and 96.43%, respectively which were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the tinnitus, deafness, hearing loss and the proportion of ear fullness of the two groups were significantly lower, and there was significantly difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Auripuncture tympanic positive pressure lavage and negative pressure drainage in the treatment of SOM has a good short-term and long-term effect and can improve the patients dry ear rate, safety is good, it is worth in clinical promotion.
王玲, 罗伟. 鼓膜穿刺鼓室加压吸引对分泌性中耳炎患者疗效的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(3): 436-438.
WANG Ling, LUO Wei. Effect of Auripuncture Tympanic Positive Pressure Lavage and Negative Pressure Drainage for Dry Ear Rate and Other Therapeutic Effects Index of Secretory Otitis Media. HeBei Med, 2017, 23(3): 436-438.
[1] 陈争明,陈步磊,许益飞,等.新型双腔鼓室和咽鼓管冲洗管联合药物治疗分泌性中耳炎的疗效观察[J].中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志,2012,19(4):227~230. [2] Li S, Zhang H, Wei Y,et al.Clinical comparative study on the treatment characteristics of secretory otitis media between cleft and non-cleft palate patients[J].Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi,2015,33(3):259~262. [3] 蒙慧菊.细针鼓膜穿刺治疗分泌性中耳炎68例临床观察[J].中华耳科学杂志,2010,8(4):478~479. [4] Weyrich LS, De Haan J, Carney AS,et al.The microbiome of otitis media with effusion in Indigenous Australian children[J].Int Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol,2015,79(9):1548~1555. [5] 万学梅,杨军,贾欢,等.儿童分泌性中耳炎的手术疗效比较、术后复发因素及对策[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2014,49(11):964~967. [6] Doru M, Kuran G, Haytolu S,et al.Role of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in the Pathogenesis of Otitis Media with Effusion[J].Int Adv Otol,2015,11(1):66~71. [7] 齐少恒,陶祥明,褚丽萍,等.鼻内镜下鼓膜置管术治疗分泌性中耳炎31例临床分析[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2014,19(3):248~249. [8] Hanes LA, Murphy A, Hatchette JE,et al.Chronic otitis media with effusion is associated with increased risk of secondary speech surgery[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2015,136(2):343~349.