Abstract：Objective: To investigate the effects of four different surgical methods for the treatment of subclinical varicocele. Methods: 235 patients in our hospital were randomly divided into 4 groups: Group A with 60 cases was treated with traditional trans inguinal canal operation, group B with 58 cases was treated with subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy, group C with 62 cases was treated with inguinal microscopic spermatic vein ligation, group D with 55 cases was treated with laparoscopic spermatic vein ligation. The operation time and hospital stay of 235 varicocele patients were recorded, and the postoperative recovery, complications, recurrence rate, the quality of semen before and after operation, and the pregnancy rate were compared. Results: The operation time of group A was the shortest of the four methods, but the hospital stay was longer than other groups (P < 0.05). The symptoms of patients in each group were significantly improved after six months, while the improvement rate of group B was higher than that of group A and group D (P < 0.05), but no statistical difference was found when compared with group C. The complication rate and recurrence rate in group B were lower than those in the other groups. The sperm quality in each group were significantly improved after 3, 6 and 12 months, in which the sperm motility of group B was obviously better than others. The pregnancy rate of the spouses in each group were 23.33%, 41.38 %, 25.81%, 27.27% respectively. There was statistically difference in the conception rate in 12 months after the surgery between group B and the other three groups.Conclusion: The four kinds of surgical procedures can significantly improve the semen quality and conception rate. But the subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy has obvious advantages in reducing the recurrence rate and improve the sperm quality and pregnancy rate of spouse, and it is worth recommending for clinical applications.
苏宏伟, 李婷, 樊勇, 李向东, 赵国斌, 张慧. 不同手术方式对精索静脉曲张患者精液质量和配偶受孕率影响[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(3): 380-383.
SU Hongwei, et al. The Effect of Four Surgical Approaches on the Semen Quality and Pregnancy Rate in Patients with Subclinical Varicocele. HeBei Med, 2017, 23(3): 380-383.
[1] French DB, Desai NR, Agarwal A. Varicocele repair: does it still have a role in infertility treatment[J].Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2008,20(3):269~274. [2] 唐亮,于德新,方卫华,等.亚临床型精索静脉曲张的诊疗在男性不育症中的临床意义[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2009,24(04):297~299. [3] 柳良仁,杨博,任尚青,等.精索静脉曲张外科治疗进展[J].西部医学,2016,28(02):285~287. [4] 谢涛.精索静脉曲张致男性不育机制的研究进展[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2016,36(1):143~146. [5] 刘应清.精索静脉曲张的病理学及相关发病机制研究[D].安徽医科大学,2009. [6] Petros J A, Andriole G L, Middleton W D, et al. Correlation of testicular color doppler ultrasonography, physical examination and venography in the detection of left varicoceles in men with infertility[J].Journal of Urology,1991,145(4):785~788. [7] Akbay E, Cayan S, Doruk E, et al. The prevalence of varicocele and varicocele-related testicular atrophy in Turkish children and adolescents[J].Bju International,2000,86(4):490~493. [8] 陈赟,徐志鹏,陈海,等.精索静脉曲张5种术式的疗效及并发症的对比观察[J].中华男科学杂志,2015,21(09):803~808. [9] Chen Y, Xu Z P, Chen H, et al. Effects and complications of five surgical approaches to the treatment of varicocele: A comparative study[J].National Journal of Andrology,2015,21(9):803~808. [10] 姜瑞.三种手术方式治疗精索静脉曲张的疗效对比[D].安徽医科大学,2013. [11] 井汉国,霍立志,袁守娴.腹腔镜下高选择性精索静脉高位结扎治疗精索静脉曲张[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2010,31(7):493~495. [12] 黄学宏.显微镜精索结扎术与腹膜后高位精索结扎术对精液质量的疗效对比研究[D].内蒙古大学,2015.
2017, Vol. 23 
冀公网安备13080202000677号