保留与切除子宫对绝经期子宫脱垂患者盆底肌电性激素尿动力学参数的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.03.020

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (12)

全文: PDF (1251 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的:探讨保留与切除子宫对绝经期子宫脱垂(UP)患者盆底肌电、性激素、尿动力学参数的影响。方法:回顾性选取2015年5月至2019年5月我院100例绝经期UP患者,根据手术方案分为切除子宫组(n=50)和保留子宫组(n=50),分别施行阴式子宫切除术(VH)+阴道前后壁修补术、单纯阴道前后壁修补术。观察两组围术期指标、并发症、复发率及术前、术后1个月盆底肌电(快速收缩、紧张收缩值、耐力测试值)、性激素指标[雌二醇(E2)、促黄体生成素(LH)、卵泡刺激素(FSH)]、尿动力学参数[最大尿道闭合压(MUCP)、腹压漏尿点压(ALPP)、最大尿道压(MUP)]。结果:切除子宫组手术时间长于保留子宫组(P<0.05),两组术中出血量、住院时间、下床活动时间比较,无显著差异(P>0.05);术后1个月切除子宫组紧张收缩值、快速收缩、耐力测试值高于保留子宫组(P<0.05);术后1个月切除子宫组E2水平低于保留子宫组,LH、FSH水平高于保留子宫组(P<0.05);术后1个月切除子宫组MUCP、ALPP、MUP高于保留子宫组(P<0.05);两组并发症发生率比较,无显著差异(P>0.05);术后随访12个月,切除子宫组复发率低于保留子宫组(P<0.05)。结论:单纯阴道前后壁修补术、VH联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗绝经期UP患者,在手术创伤、术后恢复方面效果相当,而联合手术可改善盆底肌电、尿动力学参数,降低复发率,但可对性激素水平产生一定影响。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	任俊
	周秀芬

关键词 ：盆底重建, 保留子宫, 切除子宫, 绝经期, 子宫脱垂, 盆底肌电, 性激素, 尿动力学参数

Abstract：Objective: To explore the effects of uterine preservation and removal on pelvic floor electromyography, sex hormones and urodynamic parameters in patients with menopausal uterine prolapse. Methods: A total of 100 patients with menopausal uterine prolapse in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2019 were selected and divided into uterine removal group (n=50) and uterine preservation group (n=50) according to the surgical regimens. Vaginal hysterectomy + anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair and simple anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair were performed respectively. Clinical data were observed including the perioperative indicators, complications, recurrence rate and pelvic floor electromyography (rapid contraction, tension contraction value, endurance test value), sex hormone indicators [estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)], urodynamic parameters [maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP), abdominal pressure leaking urine point pressure (ALPP), maximum urethral pressure (MUP)] before and 1 month after operation in the two groups. Results: The operation time of the uterine removal group was longer than that of the uterine preservation group (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the amount of blood loss, hospital stay, and time to get out of bed between the two groups (P＞0.05); one month after operation, the values of tension contraction, rapid contraction and endurance in the uterine removal group were higher than those in the uterine preservation group (P＜0.05); one month after operation, the E2 level of the uterine removal group was lower than that of the uterine preservation group, and the levels of LH and FSH were higher than that of the uterine preservation group (P＜0.05); the MUCP, ALPP and MUP of the uterine removal group were higher than those of the uterine preservation group at 1 month after operation (P＜0.05); there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05); after 12 months of follow-up, the recurrence rate of the uterine removal group was lower than that of the uterine preservation group (P＜0.05). Conclusion: Simple anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair, vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in the treatment of menopausal uterine prolapse patients have equivalent effects in surgical trauma and postoperative recovery. Combined surgery can improve pelvic floor electromyography and urodynamic parameters, and reduce the recurrence rate, but it can have a certain impact on sex hormone levels.

Key words： Pelvic floor reconstruction Uterus preservation Uterus removal Menopause Uterine prolapse Pelvic floor electromyography Sex hormones Urodynamic parameters

基金资助:2018年度安徽省自然科学基金项目,(编号:1808085MH232)

引用本文:

任俊, 周秀芬. 保留与切除子宫对绝经期子宫脱垂患者盆底肌电性激素尿动力学参数的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(3): 445-451.
REN Jun, ZHOU Xiufen. The Effect of Preservation Versus Removal of the Uterus on Pelvic Floor Electromyography Sex Hormones and Urodynamic Parameters in Patients with Menopausal Uterine Prolapse. HeBei Med, 2022, 28(3): 445-451.

链接本文:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.03.020 或 http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/CN/Y2022/V28/I3/445

[1] MWu,XWang,XLin,et al.Cut-offs for defining uterine prolapse using transperineal ultrasound in Chinese women:prospective multicenter study.[J].Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology:the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology,2021,58(1):127~132.
[2] 彭信刊,刘玲,黄蓉霞,等.四种阴道前后壁修补术在盆底障碍性疾病中的探讨[J].云南医药,2021,42(4):349~351.
[3] 朱朝霞,蒋莉莉,张安乐,等.阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2020,14(5):532~535.
[4] Abdelazim IA,Shikanova S,Karimova B,et al.Uterine suspension using I.Abdelazim sacrohysteropexy technique for treatment of uterine prolapse:Case series[J].Family Med Prim Care,2019,8(1):316~318.
[5] 许晓贞,施飞凤,庄月珍,等.阴式子宫切除加阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂的效果分析[J].中外医学研究,2020,18(34):142~144.
[6] 胡芝仙.腹腔镜下子宫体腹壁悬吊术对子宫脱垂患者生活质量及盆底肌电的影响[J].中国基层医药,2020,27(8):970~974.
[7] MagdalenaPiernicka,MonikaBludnicka,JakubKortas,et al.High-impact aerobics programme supplemented by pelvic floor muscle training does not impair the function of pelvic floor muscles in active nulliparous women:A randomized control trial[J].Medicine,2021,100(33):e26989.
[8] 王贵香,张树恒.生物反馈电刺激联合盆底肌锻炼对产后盆底康复的疗效[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(15):2720~2722.
[9] 高洁,吴丽群,陈游沓,等.盆底肌训练联合生物反馈电刺激治疗产后压力性尿失禁的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2021,43(6):526~528.
[10] 张晨,息金波,骆睿翔,等.腹针、艾灸联合盆底肌训练治疗女性压力性尿失禁60例临床研究[J].江苏中医药,2021,53(7):44~47.
[11] 王群,罗明艳.血清松弛素、弹性蛋白与行剖宫产术产妇产后盆底肌功能的关系及其对盆腔器官脱垂的预测价值研究[J].中国性科学,2021,30(6):70~73.