Abstract：Objective: To explore the effect of PCNL, FURL and spiral basket manipulation assisted FURL in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi with unilateral diameter > 1.0cm.Methods: From January 2017 to September 2019, 80 cases of upper ureteral calculi with unilateral diameter >1.0cm were prospectively selected for study and categorized into three groups with the random number table method: group A (26 cases) was treated with PCNL; group B (27 cases) was treated with FURL; and group C (27 cases) was treated with spiral basket manipulation assisted FURL.The operating time, intraoperative hemorrhage, length of hospital stay, success rate of lithotripsy, calculus removal rate, calculus migration rate, postoperative fever and hematuria, and incidence of lumbar discomfort were compared among the three groups.Results: There were significant differences in operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage and hospitalization time among the three groups (P<0.05); the operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage and hospitalization time in group B were lower than those in group A, the hospitalization time in group C was lower than that in group A, and the operation time was longer than that in group B (P<0.05).There were significant differences in the success rate of lithotripsy and stone clearance rate among the three groups (P<0.05); the success rate of lithotripsy and stone clearance rate of group B were lower than those of group A and group C respectively (P<0.05).The incidence of complication hematuria in group A was significantly higher than that in group B and group C (P<0.05).Conclusion: PCNL and spiral stone basket assisted furl lithotripsy has a high success rate and stone clearance rate.Furl has a shorter operation time, less bleeding during operation and a shorter hospital stay.However, the incidence of complications of PCNL is higher.That is to say, spiral stone basket assisted furl is a treatment method that takes into account the stone clearance rate, treatment effect and safety, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
[1] Utangac M M, Sancaktutar A A, Tepeler A. Micro-ureteroscopy for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi in children.[J]. 2017, 52(3):512~516. [2] 何笑凯,康郑军,柴蕴珠.三种手术方案治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石疗效、安全性及经济性对比分析[J].广东医学,2018,39(11):1705~1707. [3] Kristian M. Black, Khurshid R. Ghani. 1.5 cm stone in the lower calyx: flexible ureteroscopy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Current Opinion in Urology, 2019, 29(5):1. [4] 徐刚,郑奇传,储旭,等.输尿管硬镜联合钬激光、套石篮治疗输尿管中上段结石[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2016,19(2):186~188. [5] 《泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》编辑部.泌尿系结石诊治指南解读(一)[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,2(4):56~57. [6] Tarek Soliman, Ahmed Mohey, Mohamed Alhefnawy, et al. Fluoroless ureteroscopy for definitive management of distal ureteral calculi: randomized controlled trial[J]. Canadian Journal of Urology, 2017, 25(1):9205. [7] 赵慧,韩胜,杜凌云,等.FURL、D-PCNL单用或联合治疗<2cm肾结石的效果差异及对VAS评分、术后并发症的影响[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2019,39(6):1023~1027. [8] Mhaske S, Singh M, Mulay A, et al. Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones with a diameter <15 mm: A 3-year open-label prospective study.[J]. 2018, 10(2):165~169. [9] 陈瑶,林艳君,于圣杰,姜庆.套石篮联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石取石术治疗肾结石的疗效分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2016,41(3):257~260. [10] 周益军,朱喜山,戴晓农,等.螺旋状套石篮辅助输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗单侧直径大于1厘米输尿管上段结石临床研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2017,23(1):61~64. [11] 桂志明,苏劲,柳健军,等.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗输尿管上段大结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2017,32(1):61~64. [12] 杨超,姚俊,张双洋.上尿路结石患者行输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术后院内感染发生的相关因素分析[J].河北医学,2019,25(5):816~820. [13] 杨景明,曹炀.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术联合COOK三丝套石篮用于输尿管上段结石疗效观察[J].山东医药,2018,58(9):84~86. [14] 班勇,孙兆林,王倩倩,等.经皮肾镜取石术严重并发症的病因及转归分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38(12):923~926. [15] Massoudi R, Metzner TJ, Bonneau B,et al. Preclinical testing of a combination stone basket and ureteral balloon to extract ureteral stones[J]. Journal of Endourology, 2018, 32(2):96.
2020, Vol. 26 
冀公网安备13080202000677号