Comparative Analysis of Efficacy of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Repair with Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy Incision and Cardiopulmonary Bypass Rpair with Transthoracic Median Incision in the treatment of Atrial Septal Defect
LIU Jihong, MENG Qingtao
Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Dalian University, Liaoning Dalian 116600, China
Abstract：Objective: To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of cardiopulmonary bypass repair with right anterolateral thoracotomy incision and cardiopulmonary bypass repair with transthoracic median incision in the treatment of atrial septal defect. Methods: The clinical data of each 46 patients with atrial septal defect treated by cardiopulmonary bypass repair with right anterolateral thoracotomy incision (right small incision group) and cardiopulmonary bypass repair with transthoracic median incision (median incision group) were retrospectively analyzed. The intraoperative conditions, postoperative recovery, occurrence of postoperative complications and patient satisfaction were recorded in the two groups, and the body image status, and quality of life were compared between the two groups before operation and at 6 months after operation. Results: There were no significant differences in the intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic crossclamp time between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the intraoperative blood loss, incision length and mechanical ventilation time, postoperative intensive care time, chest drainage volume and postoperative hospital stay in right small incision group were lower than those in median incision group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The patient satisfaction in right small incision group was significantly better than that in median incision group (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, the BISS scores in the two groups were higher than those before operation (P<0.05), but the score in median incision group was higher than that in right small incision group (P<0.05). The QLI scores in the two groups were also higher than those before operation (P<0.05), but the score in right small incision group was higher than that in median incision group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Cardiopulmonary bypass repair with transthoracic median incision and cardiopulmonary bypass repair with right anterolateral thoracotomy incision both have good efficacy and safety in the treatment of atrial septal defect. However, right anterolateral thoracotomy incision procedure is more advantageous in reducing the surgical trauma, promoting postoperative rehabilitation and improving postoperative quality of life and body image, and it can improve patient satisfaction.
刘继红, 孟庆涛. 经右胸前外侧小切口体外循环修补术与经胸部正中切口体外循环修补术治疗房间隔缺损的疗效对比分析[J]. 河北医学, 2019, 25(12): 1993-1997.
LIU Jihong, MENG Qingtao. Comparative Analysis of Efficacy of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Repair with Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy Incision and Cardiopulmonary Bypass Rpair with Transthoracic Median Incision in the treatment of Atrial Septal Defect. HeBei Med, 2019, 25(12): 1993-1997.
[1] 林德清,李福平,唐文帅,等.达芬奇手术机器人房间隔缺损修补术安全性分析[J].医疗卫生装备,2017,38(11):106~108. [2] 宋杰,王波,宋来春,等.不同微创小切口与胸骨正中切口治疗儿童先天性室间隔缺损的临床对比研究[J].中国心血管病研究,2018,16(3):242~245. [3] 姜兆磊,梅举,汤敏,等.经右胸微创外科治疗成人房间隔缺损合并心房颤动[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2018,25(2):133~137. [4] 曾祥君,王信杰,虞华,等.胸骨下段小切口体外循环直视手术治疗儿童简单先天性房室间隔缺损的疗效及安全性[J].重庆医学,2017,46(23):3264~3266. [5] 高如峰,赵世祥.房间隔缺损手术后右心房状况的超声心动图临床分析[J].医学影像学杂志,2017,27(9):1813~1816. [6] Florescornejo F,Kamegotome M,Zapatapachas M A,et al.Association between body image dissatisfaction and depressive symptoms in adolescents[J].Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatria,2017,39(4):316~322.
2019, Vol. 25 
冀公网安备13080202000677号