Abstract：Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Method: Retrospective analysis of 80 patients with acute appendicitis accepted surgical treatment in our hospital from June 2014 to June 2015. Randomly divided into observation group (n=40) and control group (n=40). The observation group was received laparoscopic appendectom, the control group was treated with traditional open appendectomy. Then the operation and postoperative recovery status of the two groups of patients were compared. Result: The operation time and blood loss of the observation group were less than that of the control group (P < 0.05), postoperative exhaust time, eating time and hospitalization time were shorter than the control group (P < 0.05),and the difference was statistically significant. Wound infection and intestinal obstruction were less than that of the control group (P > 0.05), But the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy has the advantages of short operation time, less blood loss, good cosmetic results, and rapid postoperative recovery. It is a safe and feasible operative model, worthy of widespread implementation at all levels of the hospital.
郑修宇, 张勇. 腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(5): 752-755.
ZHENG Xiuyu. Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Versus open Appendectomy. 河北医学, 2017, 23(5): 752-755.
[1] 彭献景,陆学安.腹腔镜和开放阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床对比研究[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2015,25(1):62~64,65. [2] 徐慧民,孙作成,于文胜,等.常规腹腔镜器械经脐单孔法阑尾切除术与三孔法的对照观察[J].中华全科医师杂志,2013,12(6):477~478. [3] 杨文军.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的对比研究[J].检验医学与临床,2014,11(18):2604~2605. [4] 张保远.开腹手术和腹腔镜阑尾炎切除术治疗急性阑尾炎疗效比较[J].河南外科学杂志,2015,21(3):84~85. [5] 杨诗平.传统开腹手术与腹腔镜手术治疗急性穿孔性阑尾炎的疗效[J].吉林医学,2015,36(2):278. [6] Yagmurlu A, Vernon A, Barnhart D C, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy[J].Surgical Endoscopy, 2006, 20(7):1051~1054. [7] Semm K,Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy[J].Endoscopy, 1983, 15(2):59~64. [8] Murata A, Mayumi T, Muramatsu K, et al. Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: an observational study[J].Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 19(5):1~8. [9] 江鸣, 蔡兆辉,汤永胜,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2012,18(10):1105~1107. [10] Li Y, Wang J, Cui M. Comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for perforated acute appendicitis[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2014, 14(4):327~330. [11] Wang C C, Tu C C, Wang P C, et al. Outcome Comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study[J].Plos One, 2012, 8(7):65. [12] 曹建国,李志洲,王晓刚,等.不同术式阑尾切除术后切口感染的对比分析一项大型多中心回顾性研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2014,29(12):954~957. [13] Moazzez A, Mason R J, Katkhouda N. Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database[J].Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27(4):1061~1071. [14] Worni M, Gandhi M, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy outcomes on the weekend and during the week are no different: a national study of 151,774 patients[J].World Journal of Surgery, 2012, 36(7):1527~1533. [15] Khalil J, Muqim R, Rafique M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures[J].Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 17(4):236~240. [16] Ali R, Khan M R, Pishori T, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: Is this a feasible option for developing countries[J].Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology Official Journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association, 2009, 16(1):25~29. [17] Kehagias I, Karamanakos S N, Panagiotopoulos S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008, 14(31):4909~4914. [18] 黎朝良, 方兰,黄建朋,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗腹部手术史急性阑尾炎的临床研究[J].国际外科学杂志,2013,40(7):447~450. [19] Markar S R, Venkat-Raman V, Ho A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in obese patients[J].International Journal of Surgery, 2011, 9(6):451~455.
2017, Vol. 23 
冀公网安备13080202000677号